My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55A - AA - IECGP
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2011
>
04/18/2011
>
55A - AA - IECGP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2012 3:47:01 PM
Creation date
4/14/2011 4:09:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Item #
55A
Date
4/18/2011
Destruction Year
2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For State/territory-level Projects Only: <br />Per FY 2010 IECGP funding objectives, State and territory level applicants are expected to prioritize <br />Priority Group One, Leadership and Governance and Common Planning and Operational Protocols, <br />objectives over Priority Group two. If applicants are unable to check all of the following boxes, it is <br />expected that FY 2010 IECGP funds be directed to meet these minimum expectations prior to <br />choosing Priority Group Two projects. <br />? The State or territory has a formal statewide interoperable emergency communications governance <br />committee, consistent with the FY 2007 Statewide Planning Criteria, which has: <br />? Representation from each public safety discipline; <br />? Representation across each level of government: Federal, State, local, and tribal (if <br />applicable); <br />? Representation from each region within the State or territory (as applicable, and/or defined in <br />the SCIP); <br />? Executive or legislative authority and a formal charter. <br />Please also verify the following: <br />? The State or territory has hired a full-time SWIC with sufficient capabilities/resources (e.g., project <br />management, technical expertise) to effectively execute his/her mission, consistent with the FY <br />2007 Statewide Planning Criteria. <br />If not, please provide an explanation of why and how the State or territory intends on ensuring SCIP <br />implementation efforts are effectively coordinated statewide. <br />? The State or territory has developed SOPs that demonstrate consistent use of interoperability <br />channels, plain language protocols, common channel naming; and <br />? The State or territory has developed SOPS that demonstrate compliance with NIMS ICS <br />For State/territory and Local level Proiects: <br />Per FY 20101ECGP funding objectives, the applicant has the flexibility to use IECGP funds to <br />purchase interoperable emergency communications equipment if and only if it has achieved or will <br />achieve all of the above listed expectations for Priority Group One and the following Priority Group <br />objectives: <br />? The State or territory has completed a State-level multi jurisdictional, multi-agency training and <br />exercise event. (Not applicable to pass-through recipients) <br />If the State, territory, and/or pass-through recipient plans to use IECGP funds to purchase <br />interoperable emergency communications equipment, it must certify the following: <br />? The State, territory, and/or pass-through recipient certifies that it has achieved or will achieve both <br />Priority Group One and two objectives within twelve months of receipt of FY 2010 IECGP funds. <br />46 <br />55A-52
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.