Laserfiche WebLink
are also available. Additionally, as detailed in the FEIR, at 2020, the City's overall water production <br />would be 55,370 acre feet per year. Between 2010 and 2020 the City's water production would <br />increase by 2,410 acre -feet per year. The increased amount of water production between 2006 and <br />2020 would accommodate the increased water demand generated by the project and the projected build <br />out of the City's current General Plan. The project will have no new or more severe impacts beyond <br />those addressed and mitigated in the FEIR, and the FEIR remains adequate and complete. <br />e) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may <br />serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to <br />the provider's existing commitments? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />As detailed in the FEIR, the previous project would not result in wastewater generation that would <br />exceed the design capacity of the Grange County Sanitation District's (OCSD) Reclamation Plant <br />No. 1. It is anticipated that GC SD would be able handle wastewater from the proposed project. <br />However, if Plant No. 1 is operating at capacity, wastewater flows would be diverted to Reclamation <br />Plant No. 2 in Huntington Beach. Thus, the proposed project would not result in a need to expand or <br />construct a new wastewater treatment plant. The project will have no new or more severe impacts <br />beyond those addressed and mitigated in the FEIR. <br />� Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the <br />project's solid waste disposal needs? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />As detailed in the FEIR, the project as previously proposed would have a solid waste disposal demand <br />of 6,424 pounds per day. The change in solid waste based on the modified condominium component is <br />not expected to be significant. The identified daily capacity available at the Bowerman landfill is <br />adequate to support the potential increase. <br />Mitigation measures in the FEIR will ensure that no new or more severe impacts beyond those <br />addressed in the FEIR will occur. Therefore, the FEIR remains complete and adequate as it relates to <br />utilities and service systems. <br />g) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? <br />(No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />The solid waste generated by the project will not violate federal, state, and local statutes and <br />regulations related to solid waste. Mitigation measures were designed and included in the FEIR to <br />minimize potential impacts to utilities and service systems. The project will have no new or more <br />severe impacts beyond those addressed and mitigated in the FEIR. <br />XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance <br />a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the <br />habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining <br />levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a <br />rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of <br />California history or prehistory? (No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis) <br />Impacts to the environment were analyzed in the MacArthur Place South FEIR and the subsequent <br />2009 Addendum. Due to the location of the project on an urbanized site, no impacts to biological <br />resources will occur. The proposed project will not degrade the quality of the environment or <br />substantially reduce the habitat or endanger a fish, wildlife, or plant species. Therefore, the FEIR, as <br />addended, remains adequate and complete. <br />MacArthur Place South EIR — 2011 Addendum 46 <br />