My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ORANGE COUNTY CIVIC CENTER AUTHORITY - 1966
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
O
>
ORANGE, COUNTY OF
>
Civic Center Authority
>
ORANGE COUNTY CIVIC CENTER AUTHORITY - 1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2014 5:45:43 PM
Creation date
6/21/2011 8:06:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
ORANGE COUNTY CIVIC CENTER AUTHORITY
Contract #
A-1966-001
Agency
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Expiration Date
1/1/2016
Destruction Year
2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In return for the fifty -year use of our land ann facilities as collateral <br />for floating bonds for COUNTY buildings, we are condescendingly allowed to <br />sit in the rumble seat with two out of five votes and a COUNTY SELECTED <br />chairman. Is the Commission already considered to be incompetent to select <br />its first chairman, or is the county serving notice on us that they intend <br />to retain control from the very beginning? <br />(1) Why doesn't the county freely place all of its buildings into <br />the financing pool exactly as they expect us to do? Where is the <br />map delineating their future intent? This blanit- check agreement <br />allows them to remove from future jeopardy all buildings which . <br />might produce future income? �idhere is the revenue to be obtained <br />to pay off the revenue bonds? <br />(2) Why does the present agreement already contain the provision that <br />the Authority may enter into lease agreements with other <br />government agencies and districts? (A word to the wise should be <br />sufficient if the word is truly wanted) <br />(3) Why does the county ref use to have a larger Commission? Your <br />request for restriction of terms was met with four counter- <br />proposals for liberalization <br />(4) Adding the phrase about land to be purchased in the future makes <br />the power of the Authority virtually limitless (with county or <br />city permission to exercise it). <br />The power to use public funds to benefit private developers is one <br />of the most dangerous powers contained in the Joint Powers Act. <br />The 1965 amendment to the Act, adding "and other public buildings" <br />failed to add the definition of a public building. In answer to my <br />question two months ago, Mr. Thomas stated before you gentlemen <br />that the Authority had the power to define what is a public <br />building. This power, coupled with the power to purchase further <br />land in the future, creates a virtually limitless authority. <br />Do .you want to wive that much power to any agency of your creation <br />which is not directly responsible to the people who must foot the <br />bi11? <br />If a Joint Powers Agreement is approved by this council the city wi11 <br />never be the same for any of us in the future. It wi11 have been made by <br />.You, for me and for others, a -place of future bondage. Is this the way you <br />want to be remembered? <br />As I sign this letter I wi11 say a personal prayer for each of you. <br />The prayer could be briefly stated as "Forgive them, Father, for they know <br />not what they do ". <br />Sincerely, <br />_ .:' / - <br />C�jiLC_ C'-� - � , r <br />i��i / <br />z`--L 2'� � ��. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.