Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Attachment "A" <br />Construction along this segment of South Bristol Street would require supporting the utilities from <br />the top of the trench and /or the use of trench boxes /shields, which would elongate the construction <br />schedule. Due to these existing utility constraints beneath South Bristol Street, portions of this <br />roadway would need to be closed to accommodate construction associated with this alternative, <br />which has the potential to result in adverse effects to vehicular circulation. Implementation of this <br />alternative would otherwise be similar to the proposed Project during construction conditions. <br />Development of a lift station at Alternative Site No. 14 also would require the City to acquire private <br />property to implement a temporary construction easement, accommodate the proposed lift station, <br />and provide easements for proposed sewer lines. <br />3.4.16.2 Summary Comparison of Environmental Effects <br />The environmental effects of constructing the proposed lift station at Alternative Site No. 14 in <br />comparison to the proposed Project site are shown in Final EIR Table 5 -1 and described in detail in <br />RDEIR Section 5.4.16. This alternative would avoid the Project's significant and unavoidable <br />impact associated with Construction Configuration C.2; however, this alternative would create a <br />significant and unavoidable near -term impact to transportation /traffic due to a LOS deficiency that <br />would occur for approximately 84 days during construction, which is an increase in duration as <br />compared to the twenty -five (25) days of construction during which the proposed Project would <br />create a significant unavoidable impact to transportation /traffic at the South Bristol Street/West <br />Segerstrom Avenue intersection. Impacts to transportation/traffic would also occur when <br />construction activities disrupt left -turn movements, thereby diverting traffic to adjacent intersections <br />or encouraging cut - through traffic in local neighborhoods; such impacts would not occur in <br />association with the proposed Project. As such, impacts to transportation /traffic would be greater at <br />Alternative Site No. 14 as compared to the proposed Project site, and mitigation would not be <br />available to reduce these effects to less than significant levels, as there is no way to construct this <br />alternative without affecting the travel lanes within South Bristol Street, and because there is no way <br />to avoid affecting left turns along South Bristol Street during construction. <br />Total construction air quality /greenhouse gas emissions would be increased under this alternative due <br />to a longer construction period, although average daily construction emissions would be similar to <br />the proposed Project and impacts would be less than significant. In addition, construction - related <br />impacts to water quality and hydrology would be increased under this alternative due to a larger area <br />of impact, but would remain below a level of significance. Long -term odor impacts associated with <br />accident conditions and near -term noise impacts associated with nighttime dewatering activities <br />would be slightly decreased under this alternative, due to the increased distance to nearby sensitive <br />receptors, although as with the proposed Project impacts would be reduced to less than significant <br />levels with implementation of Mitigation Measures MM 3.3 -1 and 3.3 -2. Impacts related to noise, <br />utilities and service systems, and water quality and hydrology (long -term) would be similar to the <br />proposed Project and would be less than significant. <br />3.4.16.3 Finding and Rationale for Alternative Site No. 14 <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make Alternative Site No. 14 infeasible. <br />Alternative Site No. 14 would result in an overall increase in impacts to transportation/traffic as <br />compared to the proposed Project. Although this alternative would avoid the proposed Project's <br />San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR (Project No. 06 -3510) 3 -32 <br />CEQA Findings of Fact /Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />55A -71 <br />