Laserfiche WebLink
Chapter 3 Findings Regarding Project Alternatives Attachment "A" <br />Development of a lift station at Alternative Site No. 18 would require the City to acquire private <br />property to accommodate the proposed lift station. In addition, this alternative would require the <br />City to acquire a temporary construction easement to facilitate construction of the proposed lift <br />station. <br />3.4.20.2 Summary Comparison of Environmental Effects <br />The environmental effects of constructing the proposed lift station at Alternative Site No. 18 in <br />comparison to the proposed Project site are shown in Final EIR Table 5 -1 and described in detail in <br />RDEIR Section 5.4.20. This alternative would reduce the Project's significant and unavoidable <br />impact associated with Construction Configuration C.2 by two (2) weeks; however, this alternative <br />would result in a significant unavoidable impact to the capacity of the South Bristol Street roadway <br />for a total of 94 days (or 69 days longer than the proposed Project's significant unavoidable impact). <br />In addition, this alternative would result in significant unavoidable impacts to the intersection of <br />South Bristol Street/Alton Avenue for the five (5) days in which construction activities would occur <br />within the intersection, which represents a more severe impact to transportation/traffic than would <br />occur under the proposed Project. Furthermore, construction of a lift station at Alternative Site No. <br />18 would exacerbate an existing parking deficiency at this existing commercial retail building both <br />during construction and long -term operation, which would result in a total parking deficiency of 69 <br />spaces and 58 spaces under near- and long -term conditions, respectively. Near- and long -term <br />impacts to parking at Alternative Site No. 18 would be a significant and unmitigable impact. As such, <br />impacts to transportation /traffic would be greater at Alternative Site No. 18 as compared to the <br />proposed Project site. <br />Total construction air quality /greenhouse gas emissions would be increased under this alternative due <br />to a longer construction period, although average daily construction emissions would be similar to <br />the proposed Project and would be less than significant. In addition, construction- related impacts to <br />water quality and hydrology would be increased under this alternative due to a larger area of impact, <br />but would remain below a level of significance. Impacts due to nighttime dewatering during <br />construction would be slightly decreased under this alternative and, as with the proposed Project, <br />would be reduced to less than significant levels with incorporation of Mitigation Measure 3.3 -2. All <br />other impacts associated with noise would be similar to the proposed Project and would be less than <br />significant. Impacts related to utilities and service systems and water quality and hydrology (long- <br />term) would be similar to the proposed Project and would be less than significant. Impacts <br />associated with operational odors under accident conditions also would be slightly reduced under this <br />alternative; however, with implementation of Mitigation Measure MM 3.1 -1, odor impacts would be <br />less than significant for this alternative and the proposed Project. All other long -term impacts to air <br />quality /greenhouse gas emissions would be similar to the proposed Project and would be less than <br />significant. <br />3.4.20.3 Finding and Rationale for Alternative Site No. 18 <br />The City hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations <br />make Alternative Site No. 18 infeasible. <br />Alternative Site No. 18 would result in an overall increase in impacts to transportation /traffic as <br />compared to the proposed Project. Although this alternative would reduce the Project's significant <br />and unavoidable impact associated with Construction Configuration C.2 by two (2) weeks, this <br />alternative would result in a significant unavoidable impact to the capacity of the South Bristol Street <br />San Lorenzo Lift Station EIR (Project No. 06 -3510) 3 -40 <br />CEQA Findings of Fact /Statement of Overriding Considerations <br />55A -79 <br />