Laserfiche WebLink
HEMA No. 2010-03 <br />June 28, 2012 <br />Page 3 <br />Pro[ect Analysis <br />The McGowan House meets the Santa Ana Municipal Code Chapter 30, Section 30-2, Criteria for <br />Selection and qualifes for the Register of Historic Properties under Criterion 1 for its representation <br />of the distinguishing characteristics of the Colonial Revival style and Criterion T as a building or <br />structure that was connected to a business or use which was once common, but now is rare. In <br />addition to the placement, the farmhouse was categorized as "Landmark" for its historicallcultural <br />significance to the City of Santa Ana as a symbol of the agrarian era in Santa Ana. The structure <br />also meets the criteria for eligibility for inclusion on the California Register of Historical Resources. <br />Character defining features of a historic structure must be retained and preserved according to the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (Section 15064.5(b}, Exhibit 5)). Character defining features of <br />the McGowan House include original fenestration patterns, overall massing and roof configuration <br />as noted in the Department of Parks and Recreation form (DPR} noting this structure's historic <br />significance on primary elevations. Primary elevations, or those visible from the right-of-way, are <br />considered the most significant. Proposed alterations must meet the criteria established by the <br />Secretary of the Interior (Exhibit 4} to prevent potential negative impacts to the resource. <br />Proposed Changes to the North Front Elevation <br />The applicant wishes to have a covered front porch so as to provide an entertaining area for guests, <br />and shade for the front of the house. The owners also believe a front porch will supplement the <br />architectural merit of their home. Primary elevations are the most important to preserve on a historic <br />structure. The McGowan House's facade is substantially intact dating back to 1938, with the <br />western elevation being primarily original to first construction in the 1800`s (Exhibit 6). <br />Although the proposal is attractive and in keeping with the Colonial Revival style, the proposed <br />wrap-around porch would alter the character defining features of the 1938 Colonial Revival front <br />entry, and would alter the symmetrical design of the structure and do not meet the Secretary of the <br />Interior Standards 2, 3, 4, 5, and 9. The existing entry entails sidelights, fanlight, fluted pilasters, <br />and an unadorned pediment, and the prominence of these features would be compromised by the <br />proposal. Per the Secretary of the Interior's Standards, the alteration of features and spaces that <br />characterize a property must be avoided, as well as changes that create a false sense of <br />historical development. Adding conjectural or new features that change the look of the property, <br />such as reconfiguring the front porch, and would have a significant negative effect on this <br />resource. Although the front entry was changed to its current configuration in 1938, changes that <br />have acquired historic significance in their own right, such as the current front entry, shall be <br />retained and preserved in order to meet the Standards. Distinctive features and finishes must be <br />preserved in order to meet these national standards. <br />