31C - CUP - 803 S SULLIVAN ST - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Santa Ana Environmental Checklist Minimum Without Project With Project Significant Impact Acceptable Key Intersection LOS V/Ci LOS V/Cl LOS Increase Yes/No Sullivan Street at McFadden Avenue D 0.523 A 0.557 A 0.034 No tV/C for signalized intersections based on application of Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology using Traffix software, V/C = Volume/Capacity Ratio. 2The level of service is provided for the worst case Sunday peak hour- (10:15 15 a.m.). Source: Appendix D. Long-Term Cumulative Traffic Conditions-2035 Similar to near-term cumulative traffic conditions, baseline traffic conditions in the year 2035 are comprised of existing traffic conditions, ambient growth, and traffic generated by the cumulative projects as provided in Table 3-26. As shown in Table 3-30, none of the study area intersections would operate at unacceptable levels without the project in the long-term cumulative condition. The study area intersections would continue to operate at acceptable levels in the long-term cumulative intersection operations with the proposed project, and the proposed project would not result in any long-term cumulative traffic impacts. Table 3-30. Year 2035 Peak Hour Intersection Capacity Analysis Minimum Acceptable Key Intersection LOS Without Project V/CS LOS With Project V/CI LOS Significant Impact Yes/N Increase o Fairview Street at First Street D 0.704 C 0.708 C 0.004 No Sullivan Sheet at First Street D 0.553 A 0.567 A 0.014 No Fairview Street at Willits D 0.464 A 0.484 A 0.020 No Sullivan Sheet at Willits Street D 0,386 A 0.411 A 0.025 No Fairview Street at McFadden Avenue D 0.727 C 0.734 C 0.007 No Sullivan Street at McFadden Avenue D 0.550 A 0.567 A 0.017 No 1V/C for signalized Intersections based on application of Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology using Traffix software. V/C = Volume/Capacity Ratio. 2The level of service is provided for the worst case Su nday peak hour (1 0:15 a.m.-11:15 a.m.). Source: Fehr & Peers, Traffic Impact Analysis, 2012. c. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less-than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the analysis of the above- listed topics, the proposed project would have potentially significant environmental effects on air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gasses, hazards and hazardous materials, noise, and transportation and traffic that could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. However, implementation of mitigation measures as provided within each of these resource topic sections of this environmental checklist would reduce project-related potentially significant impacts to a less-than-significant level. Therefore, after implementation of mitigation measures, the proposed project would result in a less than significant environmental impact on human beings, The Bat Nha Buddhist Meditation Center 3-106 June 2013 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration ICF 00215.12 31 C-162