Laserfiche WebLink
City of Santa Ana <br />Environmental Checklist <br />existing structures on site were constructed between 1927 and 1962 and did not require substantial <br />excavation for development. A cultural resources records search at the South Central Coastal <br />Information Center did not identify any archaeological resources within the project area or within a <br />0.5-mile radius of the project area, and no previous studies included the project site. Based on the <br />preliminary research of the project area, the potential sensitivity for prehistoric archaeological and <br />paleontological remains is low and for historical archaeological remains is moderate. An <br />archaeological site survey was not conducted for this project because the project parcel is developed <br />and covered in asphalt, concrete, ornamental landscaping, and a gravel parking area. <br />Construction of the proposed building foundation will require five feet of over-excavation of soils <br />below the existing grade under and outside of the proposed structure's footprint. Additionally, <br />grading and over-compaction of soils would be required to even the site prior to construction. <br />Because the site has not previously been excavated or studied for cultural resources, there is <br />potential for subsurface artifacts. Hence, it is possible buried unknown archaeological materials <br />could be unearthed during excavation and trenching activities associated with the proposed project. <br />Therefore, construction of the proposed project may have the potential to disturb and destroy an <br />unknown buried archaeological resource. Disturbance of any unknown buried archaeological <br />resources could result in an adverse impact. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-1 <br />would reduce the potentially significant impact to a less-than-significant level. <br />Mitigation Measure CR-1: During grading excavation and trenching, a qualified professional <br />archaeologist will be present to monitor the ground-disturbing activities. If buried cultural <br />resources are discovered during ground-disturbing activities, work will stop in that area and within <br />50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find and, if <br />necessary, develop appropriate treatment measures. Treatment measures typically include <br />development of avoidance strategies or mitigation of impacts through data recovery programs such <br />as excavation or detailed documentation. If during cultural resources monitoring the qualified <br />archaeologist determines that the sediments being excavated are previously disturbed or unlikely to <br />contain significant cultural materials, the qualified archaeologist can specify that monitoring be <br />reduced of- eliminated. <br />c. Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature? <br />Less-than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated, As described above, the project area <br />does not contain any documented cultural resources; however, no known paleontological studies <br />have been conducted onsite. The geologic map of the site shows that the project area is located <br />within a broad flat alluvium/colluvium area, and the Soil Report (Appendix B) identifies silty fine <br />sand and silty clay underlying the project site. Historical high groundwater elevations below the <br />projectsite are as shallow as four feet bgs, but were measured at nine feet bgs by the Soils Study <br />prepared for the project. <br />Given the geology of the project area, it is unlikely that unknown paleontological resources exist <br />because the young surface sediments consisting of alluvium and colluvium onsite do not typically <br />contain paleontological resources. Further, Lite proposed project would require minimal grading and <br />a maximum excavation of approximately five feet below the existing grade. Therefore, there is a low <br />likelihood that paleontological resources would be encountered during construction. However, <br />because the site has not previously been excavated and or studied for paleontological resources, <br />there is potential for subsurface resources. Hence, it is possible buried unknown paleontological <br />The Bat Nha Buddhist Meditation Center 3-31 June 2013 <br />Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration icf 00215.12 <br />31 C-84