Laserfiche WebLink
ALUC Minutes <br />Page 10 <br />January 15, 2004 <br />are being added to the matrix. She reminded the members that the law and the Caltrans Handbook <br />allows local agencies two avenues to become Consistent: adopt the specific AELUP content as <br />applicable, or confirm in the General Plan their intention to refer projects to ALUC and abide by the <br />PUC procedure. She noted that in the latter case, local agencies may lack the specific information to <br />help developers around the local airports in conforming to restrictions, and therefore staff wants to <br />develop AELUP guidelines check -lists for those planning departments to better inform applicants. <br />3. Proceedings with Consistent Agencies: <br />Ms. Golding reported no changes. Replying to Chairman Bresnahan and Commissioner Propst, Ms. <br />Golding explained that JWA has not prepared a new Airport Master Plan, but rather is undertaking <br />proceeding with planning under the Settlement Agreement agreed to by the Settling Parties and <br />approved by the U.S. District Court, Central District. The Chairman explained his inquiry as relating <br />to Commissioner Kranser's earlier comments about the JWA AELUP being outdated. <br />4. Proceedings with Inconsistent Agencies: <br />Ms. Golding reported no changes. Chairman Bresnahan initiated a general discussion of Santa Ana <br />as an inconsistent local agency, coupled with the trend to very high -rise development in that City. <br />The Commissioners reached the consensus that staff should agendize the issues of high -rise <br />development in the sensitive southeast area of Santa Ana near JWA and ALUC's intent to review <br />projects therein, for the next meeting. <br />5. Items of Interest to the Public: <br />No one from the public wished to address the Commission. <br />Commissioner Harris read into the record a letter also signed by Commissioner O'Malley requesting <br />that the El Toro AELUP be agendized for the February meeting for discussion and vote on directions <br />to staff to either: Remove the El Toro portion of the AELUP so as to conform with the Board of <br />Supervisors resolution of February 25, 2003 which rescinded the El Toro Airport System Master <br />Plan and requested "preparation of the Airport Land Use Plan to reflect this action", or if not <br />approved then to replace the noise elements of the El Toro AELUP with current ambient conditions <br />to comply with the October 9, 2002 letter from the Department of the Navy to the Chairman of <br />ALUC. The letter states that "the Navy has no plans to re- commission that site" and the 1981 noise <br />study "is not applicable to the closed military facility and should not be used as a basis for any land <br />use planning effort undertake by the ALUC." A discussion ensued about whether any new <br />information is available pertaining to the El Toro issue. The Chair indicated that absent hearing <br />something different from a majority of the Commission the item won't be agendized. <br />ADJOURNMENT: <br />There being no further business before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 6:31 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Joan S. Golding <br />Executive Officer <br />