Laserfiche WebLink
Reowwtion <br />Like the approved Project the residents of the Proposed Project will most likely use the recreational <br />facilities that will be provided b}, the project. The Proposed Project residents, like the residents of <br />the approved Project, are not anticipated to use existing city recreational facilities and significantly <br />impact existing city recreational facilities. The Proposed Project will be required to pay parkland <br />fees that will he used to provide additional park and recreational facilities in Santa Ana. The <br />Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the March 19, 2007 EIR and will not have any <br />recreational impacts. <br />Trrnupormtiai/Trafific <br />The Proposed Project will generate approximately 894 fewer daily trips, including 67 fewer AM peak <br />hour trips and 77 fewer PM peak hour trips than the approved Project. The proposed 2,424 square <br />feet of retail space will mainly serve the project residents and is not anticipated to generate additional <br />trips. The Proposed Project would hive a positive traffic impact because there will be a net traffic <br />trip reduction compared to the approved Project. <br />Utilities and Senshe Sjutems <br />The Proposed Project will have a positive impact to the utilities and service systems that serve the <br />project because there will be 120 fewer residential units. As a result, there will he less consumption <br />of water and less generation of wastewater and solid waste. The Proposed Project will have a <br />positive impact on utilities and service systems compared to the approved Project. <br />V. Summary of Finditigs <br />Based on the environmental analysis, the Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant <br />impacts that were not previously analyzed and adequately addressed in the Metro East Nlixed Use <br />Overlay Zone and First and Cabrillo Towers EIR and adopted March 19, 2007. The Proposed <br />Project will provide 120 less residential units and 6,476 square feet of retail space less than the <br />approved Project. <br />As demonstrated by this Addendum: <br />s The Proposed Project does not constitute substantiA changes that will requite major <br />revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental <br />effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously significant effects; <br />e The Proposed Project does not constitute substantial changes with respect to the <br />circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken which will require major <br />revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new sigmiloint environmental <br />effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previous identified significant effects; and <br />The Proposed Project does not constitute new information of substantial importance that <br />show that the Proposed Project will have one of more significant effects not discussed in the <br />1901 Fast First Street _ Addendum <br />August 14, 2013 <br />75A -106 <br />Page 9 <br />