My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH 1901 East First St
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2013
>
11/18/2013
>
75A - PH 1901 East First St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2013 9:26:31 AM
Creation date
11/15/2013 9:01:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
11/18/2013
Destruction Year
2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hydmlogy and 1 [ %a /er ,Qenli� <br />The Proposed Project will not have any significant hydrology or water quality impacts. T'lie amount <br />and the quality of the surface water generated by the Proposed Project will be the same as the <br />approved Project. The Proposed Project is consistent with the analysis in the NGarch 19, 2007 EIR, <br />Laud Use and Planning <br />The Proposed Project proposes 120 less tesidential units than the appxoved Project. As a result, <br />there will be less density and the building heights will be less than the approved Project. The <br />Proposed Project, like the approved Project, meets all applicable design and development standards <br />for development in the Active Urban District the project. The Proposed Project is consistent with <br />the analysis in the March '17, 2007 EIR and there will be no land use impacts. <br />Minerwl Resonrees <br />The Proposed Project will not have any mineral impacts. Based on the approved Project EIR there <br />are no mineral resources on or adjacent to the project site. Therefore, the Proposed Project is <br />consistent with the analysis and mitigation treasures in the March 19, 2007 EIR. <br />AToire <br />The Proposed Project will not result in any new or significant noise impacts compared to the <br />approved Project. The project proposes 120 fewer residential units than the approved Project and <br />as a result the time of construction will be less. Because the Proposed Project will have less <br />development there will less traffic and less traffic noise. '11te Proposed Project will have a positive <br />noise impact compared to the approved Project because there wiH be less noise generated during <br />project construction and the life of the project. <br />Populalion and Housing <br />The Proposed Project will have 120 fewer residential units than the approved Project. As a result, <br />the project will generate fewer people than the approved Project. Like the Project, the Proposed <br />Project will not elitninatc any existing housing and require the construction of replacement housing. <br />With fewer project residents the Proposed Project will have a less growth inducement. The <br />Proposed Project will not have any population or housing impacts. <br />PnGlie Services <br />The Proposed Project will have a positive impact to public services compared to the Project because <br />the Proposed Project will have 120 fewer residential units. With fewer residents the demand fox <br />public services will be less with a positive impact on the public services that serve the project. The <br />Proposed Project will have a positive impact to public services compared to die Project. <br />1901 Past First Sueet -- Addendum <br />August 14, 2013 <br />75A -105 <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.