My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A SEXLINGER FARMHOUSE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A SEXLINGER FARMHOUSE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2014 1:31:58 PM
Creation date
3/5/2014 12:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
3/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARCHITECT MILFORD WAYNE DONALDSON FAIA <br />Orchard, preserving only 10 trees with space for planting up to 6 new orange trees. The <br />environmental impact report (EIR) for the demolition concludes that preservation of 10 to <br />16 trees in a single row on a one - quarter acre corner of the Orchard will not have a <br />significant adverse impact on the historic significance of the Sexlinger property. <br />The proposal to demolish 95 percent of the Orchard does not comply with the Secretary's <br />Standards, even when combined with retention and rehabilitation of the Farmhouse. The <br />Orchard and Farmhouse currently have a high degree of integrity that reflects their <br />historic use. Loss of 95 percent of the Orchard would cause a significant loss of integrity, <br />and would affect those features and characteristics that qualified the combined Orchard <br />and Farmhouse for listing on the National and California Registers. It is my <br />understanding that the Council recognized the historic significance of the entire property, <br />including both the Orchard and Farmhouse, when it designated them together in the <br />"Key" resource designation. <br />Demolition of the majority of the Orchard would cause the Sexlinger property to lose its <br />historic significance. Loss of significance, as well as the loss of contributing elements, is <br />a significant impact under CEQA, requiring mitigation. Without the Orchard, the <br />Farmhouse alone would in all likelihood lose its eligibility for the National or California <br />Registers because it would lack the ability to demonstrate a vital connection with the <br />area's agricultural heritage. <br />The Orchard demolition fails to comply with the Secretary 's Standards for multiple <br />reasons. Under the National Register Bulletin entitled "Defining the Boundaries for <br />National Register Properties," the entire Orchard parcel is included within the eligible <br />site. The Orchard and Farmhouse were a single functional unit, in common ownership, <br />on a single parcel and visually separate from surrounding uses. Under the Secretary 's <br />Standard's, a building site consists of historic "buildings, structures, and associated <br />landscape features within a designed or legally defined parcel of land." In this case, as <br />recognized by the Council in its designation, the Orchard is significant in its own right, as <br />well as in combination with the Farmhouse. <br />The Secretary 's Guidelines for the Treatment of Cultural Landscapes requires <br />consideration of continuity of form, use, features and materials. The geographic context <br />of the landscape, including the component elements and features, are factors that affect <br />the appropriate treatment. Natural systems are an integral part of the cultural landscape <br />and must be considered in selecting an appropriate treatment. Although it is often <br />impossible to preserve the entirety of a cultural landscape in an urban setting, enough of <br />the landscape must be retained to maintain integrity and the ability to convey <br />4100 FOLSOM BLVD Units% SACRAMENTO, CA 95819 mwdonatdsonl3 @yahoo.com 916 532 8004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.