My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A SEXLINGER FARMHOUSE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
03/04/2014
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A SEXLINGER FARMHOUSE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2014 1:31:58 PM
Creation date
3/5/2014 12:40:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
3/4/2014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Step 4. <br />For each water resource supply portion of the project site, determine whether <br />irrigated and dryland agriculture is feasible, and if any physical or economic <br />restrictions exist, during both drought and non - drought years. These italicized <br />terms are defined below: <br />• Aphysical restriction is an occasional or regular interruption or reduction in a <br />water supply, or a shortened irrigation season, that forces a change in agricultural <br />practices -- such as planting a crop that uses less water, or leaving land fallow. <br />(This could be from cutbacks in supply by irrigation and water districts, or by ground <br />or surface water becoming depleted or unusable. Poor water quality can also result <br />in a physical restriction -- for example by requiring the planting of salt - tolerant plants, <br />or by effectively reducing the amount of available water.) <br />• An economic restriction is a rise in the cost of water to a level that forces a <br />reduction in consumption. (This could be from surcharge increases from water <br />suppliers as they pass along the cost of finding new water supplies, the extra cost of <br />pumping more ground water to make up for losses in surface water supplies, or the <br />extra energy costs of pumping the same amount of ground water from deeper within <br />an aquifer.) <br />• Irrigated agricultural production is feasible when: <br />1) There is an existing irrigation system on the project site that can serve the <br />portion of the project identified in Step 2; <br />2) Physical and /or economic restrictions are not severe enough to halt <br />production; and <br />3) It is possible to achieve a viable economic return on crops though irrigated <br />production. <br />(A major question that should be considered is, if there is an irrigated crop that can be <br />grown within the region, can it actually be grown on the project site? Depending upon the <br />jurisdiction, some typical crops that have a large water demand may not be feasible to <br />grow on the project site, while others that require less water are feasible. Information to <br />aid in making this determination can be obtained from county agricultural commissioners, <br />the UC Cooperative Extension, irrigation districts, and other sources.) <br />• Dryland production is feasible when rainfall is adequate to allow an economically <br />viable return on a nonirrigated crop. <br />• Adrought year is a year that lies within a defined drought period, as defined by the <br />Department of Water Resources or by a local water agency. Many regions of the <br />state are by their and nature dependent upon imports of water to support irrigated <br />agriculture. These regions shall not be considered under periods of drought <br />unless a condition of drought is declared for the regions that typically would be <br />providing water exports. <br />it.] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.