75B - PH - EIR 1584 SANTA CLARA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard Residential Development Project CEQA Findings Analysis: The project would increase impervious surfaces at the project site, resulting in a 25 year runoff of approximately 4.7 cfs and 7.8 cfs, at different locations. A hydrology technical report was completed for the project, and concluded that the flows from the proposed project as compared with the existing conditions at the site are minor and would not exceed the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility downstream of the project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 FIR Attachment, 7.) 2. Impact: Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 FIR Attachment, 7.) Analysis: The project would increase impervious surfaces at the project site, resulting in a 25 year runoff of approximately 4.7 cfs and 7.8 cfs, at different locations. A hydrology technical report was completed for the project, and concluded that the flows from the proposed project as compared with the existing conditions at the site is minor and would not exceed the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility downstream of the project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 EIR Attachment, 7.) 3. Impact: Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Finding: Less Than Significant. (FIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 EIR Attachment, 7.) Analysis: The project would increase impervious surfaces at the project site, resulting in a 25 year runoff of approximately 4.7 cfs and 7.8 cfs, at different locations. A hydrology technical report was completed for the project, and concluded that the flows from the proposed project as compared with the existing conditions at the site is minor and would not exceed the capacity of any street or adjacent storm drain facility downstream of the project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 FIR Attachment, 7.) 1. Impact: Would the project conflict with an applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environment effect? Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -55, 5 -56; January 2014 FIR Attachment, pp. 7 -8) 7 55562 "Exhibit A"