My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75B - PH - EIR 1584 SANTA CLARA
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
09/02/2014
>
75B - PH - EIR 1584 SANTA CLARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2014 4:18:57 PM
Creation date
8/28/2014 3:54:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75B
Date
9/2/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
604
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Sexlinger Farmhouse and Orchard <br />Residential Development Project <br />I. NOISE <br />CEQA Findings <br />Analysis: The project is currently designated single family residential and low density <br />residential on City plans. While the site would require a variance for reduced street <br />frontages for Lot 7 (from 50 feet to 38 feet) and for Lot 8 (from 50 feet to 45 feet), <br />variances do not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy or regulations as they <br />are allowed by the City Zoning Code. The project would also comply with the City's <br />General Plan goal supporting development of single family residential lots of minimum <br />areas of at least 6,000 square feet. As a result, this impact is less than significant. <br />Because the project would maintain the existing historic structure located on the property, <br />the project would also be consistent with any goals and policies supporting the <br />preservation of historic resources within the City. (EIR, pp. 5 -53, 5 -54; January 2014 <br />FIR Attachment, pp. 7 -8.) <br />1. Impact: Would the project expose persons or generate excessive groundborne vibration or <br />groundborne noise levels? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -58, 5 -59, 5 -60; January 2014 EIR <br />Attachment, p. 8) <br />Analysis: Long -term operational activities associated with noise are the vehicular traffic <br />going into and out of the residential community. Typical automobile traffic does not <br />generate vibration levels that can be felt within adjacent residential dwellings, therefore <br />operational activities would not generate excessive vibrations and this impact is less than <br />significant. (EIR, p. 5 -59; January 2014 FIR Attachment, p. 8.) Any groundborne <br />vibration associated with construction would be temporary in nature and therefore would <br />also be a less than significant impact. (FIR, p. 5 -58.) <br />2. Impact: Would the project cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels <br />in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />Finding: Less Than Significant. (EIR, pp. 5 -58, 5 -59, 5 -60; January 2014 EIR <br />Attachment, p. 8) <br />Analysis: Long -term operational activities associated with the project would be the <br />vehicular traffic going into and out of the residential community. The greatest number of <br />vehicles that would travel any of the roadways near the project site is along East Santa <br />Clara Avenue. There would be a maximum of 138 project -added vehicle trips on this <br />roadway each day. At a posted speed of 40 miles an hour, this would generate a noise <br />exposure level of less than 47 dBA CNEL 50 feet from the roadway centerline and would <br />not exceed exterior noise level standards set by the City of Santa Ana. Therefore, this <br />impact is considered less than significant. (EIR, p. 5 -50.) <br />J. POPULATION AND HOUSING <br />Impact: Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly <br />or indirectly? <br />75BI -563 "Exhibit A" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.