|
The City Council adopted a resolution that listed the Sexlinger
<br />Farmhouse and Orchard on the SARHP on June 4, 2012. The
<br />action designated the site as "Key" as described in SAMC Section
<br />30- 2.2(2)c. Followit that designation. the property owners
<br />proposed demolition of the on site sttuctures,_which triggered an
<br />open, public.
<br />athd comprehensive process through which all
<br />feasible preservation alternatives were thorou'Flily evaluated. An
<br />ad hoc committee was formed, which included members of the
<br />Crty'sHrstoric Resources Commission, City staff, members of the
<br />ub is interested in preserving the site and representatives of the
<br />property....owers. The committee
<br />and City staff explo4:
<br />preservation options by examining 28 different potential public
<br />funding sources and actively soliciting interest in purchasing the
<br />Uro )ertty from no less than 19_private groups and organizations. At
<br />the conclusion of this process, the Crtv_'s Historic Resources
<br />Commission held a public hearing at which it cott.ttsively
<br />determined that there are no feasible preservation alternatives for
<br />the Site. Despite that conclusion, City staff nevertheless in
<br />reSlJOnse to a comm_ ent on the EIR — commissioned an additional
<br />analysis to study a Historic_ Preservation Alternative he Historic
<br />Preservation Alternative would preserve the existing funnahouse
<br />and garage in place. and call for the preservation of some of the
<br />trees on site (together with the planting of additional like -kind
<br />trees). The additional analysis found that the Historic Preservation
<br />Alternative would avoid impacts to cultural resources. and would
<br />constitute an environmentally superior alternative. Upon receiving
<br />and reviewing the additional analysis, the applicant has agreed to
<br />modify its develo went rronosal to reflect the Historic
<br />Preservation Alternative. By these actions. it is clear that _the City
<br />has proactively encouraged the retention and reuse of historical
<br />buildings and sites as required by the s, ,,u t�r-t w l>mpox i d I)iolee
<br />wartrF9 eerr6firC will* --- City of Santa Ana General Plan Land Use
<br />Element Goal 4 and ;- Policy 4.2_Tkvhic h crar:(sxu,wes lhc, ra.l.rrtion
<br />�trr1 ra. �F= Erf dit,Yr,ta� -a1 l'riulria3 r., araeC ;raw, f ti -� omlfl+,H tlrt t r[:y
<br />or' `awl ) l n. t General Hmi Laiid Usf i,teraacnt Coal �N, Polkly 4.2
<br />FExalel... rc-At ns €Eta , "YMI C existing,
<br />residefl gal strtwiura ^. , rreiibrailrhrr« raarR( n- alloou (recs. However, r, n
<br />�,fl� +tcaG.isHtk,r ¢ " -E.,:y irCrs,�ctta- ,htit flex +i:rFo-1 Milli, — -Am(l ll e l,kr,rryr;rafi;
<br />Iiatprlertnc�rE,Hrrrrt--Plrua, tFrr�- ;.rt�l rrllat! ^r�--trrrrl¢.e.ir r;c ��arlhleafi.[a 17rF�;e,,t
<br />m�� latrrtk <r. t,i�,
<br />. , rr.y +r�a ]a:errc,,rrrv.- unrr.t lx +rlsct� E>otrr.;(t+s
<br />,cr+ietl =t:r [i €. € =�,�tk�rlvsrl 4}ho-�oiN�*Gt f(rra - -( iEy'1� re�.,��iiew larf>rw�(�,er4, with
<br />a r.�lar,c�,r +IroE. +;¢�r�i4, amf pc +olaer�� .a€ -alai, o,rV;:; -'w d,c�aerra�1'R�t., [,,rrrd
<br />P rep 12 lc rnrciat:
<br />• The text of Section 7.3.2, under the heading "Land Use and Planning" (Pages 7 -4 to
<br />7 -5) is modified as follows:
<br />-b-
<br />75A-92
<br />
|