My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/16/2014
>
25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2014 4:17:06 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 4:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25F
Date
12/16/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2 <br />4.0 ALTERNAITVE PIPELINE ROUTE ANALYSIS <br />4.1 INTRODUCTION <br />4.1.1 Background <br />This section and subsections that follow present the process validation and selection approach, summarize <br />the five pipeline routing options that have been identified, and present the two recommended pipeline <br />routings for the Delhi Diversion Facility. <br />Per earlier investigation, the on -site sewer pipeline does not have the capacity for the additional flow from <br />the Delhi Channel. The harvested dry- weather flow from the Delhi Channel has to be sent to sewer <br />collection systems further downstream. Thus, URS investigated potential routes to connect the discharge <br />FM to potential locations, including the following: 1) connection to the local sewer collection system, <br />owned and operated by Costa Mesa Sanitary District (CMSD), which will also discharge to the OCSD <br />trunk main; and 2) direct connection to the OCSD trunk main further downstream. For both pipe routes, <br />the conveyed flow will ultimately be treated by regional wastewater treatment facilities. <br />4.1.2 Objective and Study Approach <br />The objective of this section is to summarize the investigations, in order to establish, evaluate, and <br />compare alternative routes for the proposed Diversion Facility sanitary sewer discharge force main (the <br />force main) and identify the most cost - effective pipeline route. The preferred alternatives will be based on <br />constructability and maintainability. A detailed approach has been implemented to identify the best <br />constructible route for the force main. This approach consists of the following major components: <br />• Identify potential pipeline route alternatives; <br />• Prepare preliminary cost for purposes of comparing the alternative routes; <br />• Perform a hydraulic analysis on the preferred route; <br />• Identify the preferred routes, considering the criteria ranking and costs. <br />This analysis reviews all project related information, such as digital aerial maps, Orange County Public <br />Works Records, easement descriptions, right -of -way (ROW) records, available utility system data, and <br />other pertinent information for an effective execution of the proposed project. <br />The objective of this analysis is to assist in identifying the most favorable route for the force main. It will <br />also serve as the document of record for technical support in later engineering decisions as the Project is <br />designed and constructed. <br />URS 15 <br />25F -147 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.