My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2014
>
12/16/2014
>
25F - AGMT - DELHI DIVERSION PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2014 4:17:06 PM
Creation date
12/11/2014 4:08:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25F
Date
12/16/2014
Destruction Year
2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
240
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preliminary Design Report Addendum No.2 <br />4.2 BASIC DATA <br />4.2.1 Introduction <br />In order to compare and evaluate suitable alternative pipeline routes, it is necessary to acquire a variety of <br />information or basic data on existing and proposed conditions. Comparative evaluations of the alternative <br />routes include the development of probable construction costs, land acquisition costs, and where <br />applicable, additional design costs. Other pertinent criteria, which are not readily cost identifiable, have <br />been assessed by means of an evaluation matrix. This matrix will be discussed later in the study. <br />4.2.2 Route Study Area <br />A route study area is the area within which alternative routes from Point A to Point B are developed. In <br />this alternative study, Point A is at the proposed Delhi Channel Diversion Facility's Pump Station and <br />Point B includes the connection points to existing sewer conveyance systems at various potential <br />locations, as described in Section 4.3. <br />4.2.3 Aerial Photographs <br />Aerial photography is necessary in pipeline route selection to identify highways, railroads, <br />environmentally sensitive lands, density of development, waterways, and other natural and man -made <br />features visible from air. For this alternative study, the aerial photos covering the route study area were <br />obtained from Google Earth Pro. <br />4.2.4 Existing Utility Data <br />Information on existing public utilities, particularly underground utilities, is required to identify pipeline <br />routes that will result in minimizing potential utility conflicts during construction. Existing large diameter <br />sanitary and storm sewers, sanitary force mains and water mains are usually the greatest concern. Other <br />utilities, including buried communications lines, gas mains, and power lines are also important, but are <br />typically much smaller in diameter than sewers and water mains. Consequently, they do not have a <br />significant impact on route selection, as it is comparatively easy to avoid these utilities or at least provide <br />adequate clearance for their protection during construction. The locations of above - ground power and <br />communications lines can affect route selection. <br />The following utility agencies maintain existing utilities with the alternative route corridors: <br />• Water <br />— City of Newport Beach <br />• Water <br />— City of Costa Mesa <br />• Sewer <br />— Orange County Sanitation District <br />• Sewer <br />— Costa Mesa Sanitation District <br />• Electricity — Southern California Edison <br />• GAS — <br />SC GAS <br />• Telephone — AT &T Distribution <br />• Cable <br />— Time Warner Cable <br />I= 16 <br />25F -148 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.