Laserfiche WebLink
e <br />e <br />'•,�,+�,�; INSTIT11-11 at <br />°. : MUSIDUM.ndLibrary <br />SERVICES <br />LG•07.14.0067 City of Santa Ana <br />L13- Statement of Need <br />The project builds upon an existing model using a known program with Historypin as a collaborator. There is <br />a lot of research, both informal and through Library Services for Immigrants and Civics and Citizenship Toolkit <br />that indicates their target audience and recommendations for moving forward. I like that the innovation is <br />pointed toward online and offline programming, engagement, training, and infrastructure. <br />LG- Impact <br />Pilot programs are evidence that the project will continue to be successful. An advisory group will review the <br />jumpkit, assess other programs, and have a design session. <br />They are going to do extensive interviewing of all Involved to evaluate the quantity and quality of success — <br />count the number of stories, but also Interview librarians, immigrant teens and immigrant populations <br />involvement. It is unclear how this will be done and what questions will be asked or if will flow more <br />spontaneously -- the approach. Also, if there is a method by which they will revise in year 2 or 3 based on <br />feedback, However, 1 think it will have a positive and strong impact. <br />LG•Project Design <br />I think the communication plan is pretty typical and robust. The exception and benefit is the use of <br />REFORMA for greater access to Latinos and Spanish speakers. The advisory panel is also offering <br />additional support Into additional avenues like pop culture and music channels. And the communication is <br />incorporated into the work phases in the project design also so I think they bases are covered well. <br />LG,Preject Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />Tutors are being paid at a rate of $171hour -- good, Eberly and Zepeda are puting a groat deal of their time to <br />managing this project which I think is on target given the 4 locations. <br />I like that the budget narrative includes justification that the costs are based on kayak.com and a US <br />Government survey -- which may be low or totally wrong, but good to see uses of national standards for <br />compensation and other costs. <br />The budget looks fairly straight forward to me in that most of the funding goes toward staffing and equipement <br />at the four locations. <br />LG- Communications Plan <br />I think the communication plan Is pretty typical and robust. The exception and benefit is the use of <br />REFORMA for greater access to Latinos and Spanish speakers. The advisory panel is also offering <br />additional support into additional avenues like pop culture and music channels. And the communication is <br />incorporated into the work phases in the project design also so I think they bases are covered well, <br />LG- Sustainability <br />The jumpkit is aimed at the public and other libraries who could participate and contribute to Historypin is free <br />which is a great sustainability measure. Thought it's currently scheduled to be hosted one year beyond the <br />grant period, having exhibitions as part of their possible programming to generate income and put back in the <br />project is a great plan. <br />Total Score: 4 <br />Additional Commeau: t think this is an ambitious project and one that is warranted for 3 years given the 4 <br />locations, t think the collaborations with HistoryPin and AmeriCorps are smart. <br />This seems to align with RMLS goals for taigat audience, collaboration, <br />technological infrastructure and innovation, and using existing standards and best <br />practices for intellectual property and digital asset management, <br />