My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
F
>
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 9:51:58 AM
Creation date
2/10/2015 11:26:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Contract #
A-2014-280
Agency
PARKS, RECREATION, & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Council Approval Date
11/18/2014
Expiration Date
12/31/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
♦ d <br />.e A <br />' •.;d¢: INSTITUTE n6 <br />IY useumind Library <br />�•''• SERVICES <br />. e • i <br />LG -07.1.1-0067 City of Santa Ana <br />LG- Statement of Need <br />The statement of need is only slightly confusing, because it seems these particular organizations already <br />have funding that can be used to serve these populations. What would be nice for the reviewer would be a <br />clearer statement of NEED rather than a statement of "let's keep this thing going." I support this work, but I <br />would wonder what the IMLS sees as its priorities with this kind of grant. Is it for new demonstration projects <br />or for continuing to enhance infrastructure for current successes, or both? What is clear from the Historypin <br />site is that we need more migration stories, and if this enables that, then we should support it. <br />LG- Impact <br />It is clear from the literature and from successes of projects like this that if delivered successfully this <br />demonstration will have great impact, <br />Questions <br />What Is a "robotic diglfization kit "? <br />LG- Project Design <br />There are models being deployed in the application of this demonstration (e.g., Teen Community Historians <br />Model). What does It mean for a demonstration grant to deploy particular models at particular site when they <br />are not accounted for in the evaluation and assessment explicitly? How do you know these work and these <br />are the ones to chose in the first place? <br />Will the content created at particular sites be shared? If they are entered in the site's particular content <br />management system, how do we guarantee one of your key concerns which is interoperability mentioned in <br />the section above? <br />LG- Project Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />These are small percentages for such an ambitious and complex project, yes? <br />1-0-Communications; Plan <br />Is there any assessment of the Teen Community Historian model in this context? <br />LO- Sustalnability <br />Seems fine to me. <br />Seems fine to me. <br />Total Score: J <br />Additional Commurns' No further comments for this proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.