My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
F
>
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 9:51:58 AM
Creation date
2/10/2015 11:26:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
FEDERAL INSTITUTE
Contract #
A-2014-280
Agency
PARKS, RECREATION, & COMMUNITY SERVICES
Council Approval Date
11/18/2014
Expiration Date
12/31/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMLS Completed Review Report <br />6 <br />`mr <br />w m <br />m�♦9 <br />m <br />npsm�ir q INyfIIUTE of <br />- : V iseuma ndLib <br />rary <br />.+ »g <br />SERVICES <br />00 <br />LG- 07.14.0067 City of Santa Ann <br />NLG-Statement of Need <br />This project Is very creative. It will create a partnership with an established nonprofit (Historypin) to engage <br />the new immigrant community with technology and civic engagement. During the current policy debate <br />climate, this project will provide a positive opportunity to engage the community in meaningful work but it will <br />also position the library as a leader in civic engagement. I am especially impressed by their plan to include <br />national participants In this project Queens, New Mexico, West Hartford, Kudos! Shows that they've done <br />their homework and that they will leverage this project idea in ways that will benefit local public library based <br />community programming, with strong potential to serve as a national model for other libraries (and community <br />based organizations). This is a demonstration project with a technology, community building twist. <br />NLG- Project Design <br />As stated in the previous section, the project design is very well thought out. I especially like the fact that they <br />have stated very specific goals and included several partnerships with libraries that have well developed <br />immigrant programming in place. The idea of a jump kit (a new version of the tool kit ?) is good. I do have <br />some concerns re, the scope of the project. The coordination and communication challenges across the <br />country may pose some challenges for collecting meaningful data (but that's what demonstration projects are <br />all about, right ?). <br />NLG- Impact <br />The strategy for measuring the impact of the project is based on the production and quality of the products <br />(Jump Kit, use of digital tools, etc). There is also an element for measuring local participation. Any thoughts <br />on measuring the impact on the library operations? Library staff? <br />NLG - Project Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />There are a lot of moving parts to this project. Given the national scope (with multiple areas of local focus) it <br />will be a challenge to coordinate all of the activities and complete the major goals. Santa Ana's operating <br />budget looks small when compared to the amount of IMLS and "cost- share" funding needed to support the <br />project. So, I would need to know more about how the actual project might affect the day to day operations of <br />the Santa Ana Public Library. <br />NLO - Communications Plan <br />Social media outlets will be used throughout the project. Each participant will be expected to exploit <br />communications using local media channels. Major partner - Historypin - will also use its media channels to <br />inform their community about the project. They mention an advisory panel, but there the members are not <br />named. Most of the communications strategy is about promoting the project . which is fine. I'm not sure how <br />they will actually communicate with the people that they want to recruit or the participants once they are on <br />board. Also, how will the communication strategy be evaluated? Because of the national scope, it would be <br />good to capture what works, didn't work for replication in the future. <br />NLG . $ustainability <br />I look at this project as an "event ". Events typically don't need to be sustained but should be looked at as <br />experiments from which larger lessons can be learned and applied to the goals of the organization. So, in <br />that case, I would want to know more about how the lessons learned will be applied to the operations and <br />programs for each of the participants. <br />Total Score: 5 <br />Additional Comments. Creative, hold and timely! Scope could be a challenge. But, overall asolid <br />demonstration project, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.