Laserfiche WebLink
IMLS Completed Review Deport <br />'�w,•: IN5'rITIJ fE of <br />MuseurriaadLibrary <br />.y SERVICES <br />A f <br />' e <br />LG- 07.14.0067 City of Santa Ana <br />NLG- Statement of Need <br />This proposal seeks to increase community engagement across multiple partners and users bases. As such, <br />it is very ambitious in Its scope, Integrating some pre - existing Infrastructure through partnerships (e.g. <br />HlstoryPin) is a great way to take advantage of dynamic technology without recreating the wheel. <br />NLG - Project Design <br />The lack or choice not to utilize controlled vocabulary does limit the potential of this project (E1). User created <br />folksonomies are fine in conjunction with some basic, shared framework. Not having an idea of how metadata <br />will be employed prior to generating content is dangerous, There is no mention of IRS protocols Involved in <br />the interviewing of third parties. Some work should be put into that component before proceeding (Part III, 2). <br />The main challenge with this grant is coordinating all the moving parts. Having broken it out the way the <br />authors did, however, points to that awareness on their part. What would make this a stronger proposal is a <br />basic articulation of what would happen if there were any major breakdown with one of the partners. How <br />would that impact the overall goal of the project? Would it? Final point - there should be a shared MOU1IRB <br />type document for all of the oral history participants that is documented as part of the effort. Having a clear <br />rights landscape for participants is essential for future sustainabiiity. There should be more specificity as to <br />the nature of the geographic metadata that is created and will be managed. How will that be handled? It is a <br />vital part of the use value of HistoryPin and as such, should be clearly set out in advance. <br />NLG - Impact <br />As a multi -part process, this proposal will reach a wide audience and help develop some mutually- beneficial <br />relationships of training and user community. <br />NLG - Project Resources: Personnel, Time, Budget <br />As mentioned before, there are many moving parts to this grant. The coordination among them will be key, Mr <br />Voss is very capable and setting up point - person leaders in each of the partners helps distribute and <br />inculcate a solid methodology among there. This project could have far - reaching ramifications - especially if it <br />is well documented. There is also a 100% staff member who is dedicated to the project which is a sign that <br />the complexity is not lost upon the authors. <br />NLG - Communications Plan <br />Engaging the UGC and students in the social media that they are most comfortable with is key. Then having a <br />solid brand that they can link to and reference would make this a solid strategy. <br />NLG - Sustainability <br />Some of the preservation concerns are address through backup strategies but given the amount of materials <br />that are going to be addressed, there needs to be a greater attention placed on preservation. Will the digital <br />files he in a preservation environment where they are audited for fixity, bit rot, etc? One cannot assume that <br />each partner has the same level of expertise in this regard. Simply having multiple backups is a good start but <br />given that unique oral histories will be captured, the loss of any of these is permanent. <br />Total Score: a <br />Additional Comments: This is a strong grant with a compciling story to tell. This reviewer is thrilled to see <br />partnerships with external agencies such as HlatoryPin and Amer9Corps. The <br />danger, orcourse, is that this is a highly complex partnership with many individuals <br />and moving parts. it will take a very steady hand at the wheel but If success is <br />aolileved, it could haves broad impact on library engagement with diverse <br />communities and haw we can help tell their stories. <br />