My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH - EIR THE HERITAGE 2001 E DYER
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
02/02/2016
>
75A - PH - EIR THE HERITAGE 2001 E DYER
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2016 4:39:05 PM
Creation date
1/28/2016 4:04:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
2/2/2016
Destruction Year
2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
274
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EIR No. 2015 -01, AA No. 2014 -04, <br />GPA No. 2015 -03, DA No. 2015 -03 & VTl'M No. 2015 -03 <br />October 12, 2015 <br />Page 6 <br />AnalvsIs of the Issues <br />Dyer 18 LLC is requesting entitlements to construct The Heritage, a mixed -use development <br />proposed on an 18.84 -acre parcel of land in southeast Santa Ana. The applicant is proposing a <br />project that is inconsistent with the development pattern and land uses in this area of the City. The <br />following subsections of this staff report provided analyses for each of the proposed action items, <br />Environmental Impact Report <br />The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation and approval of an <br />environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The environmental issues analyzed in the EIR <br />include Aesthetics; Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Geology, Soils and Seismicity; Greenhouse <br />Gas Emissions; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Hydrology and Water Quality; Land Use and <br />Planning; Noise; Population and Housing; Public Services; Parks and Recreation; Transportation <br />and Traffic; and Utilities and Service Systems. <br />In accordance with CEQA, a draft EIR was first circulated for review and comment to public, local, <br />regional and state agencies, and interested parties on July 17, 2015 for a 45 -day review period. On <br />August 24, 2015, a public hearing was held on the document to obtain input from interested <br />members of the public. By the close of the 45 -day review period on August 31, 2015, a total of eight <br />written comment letters on the document were received. <br />The City has evaluated the comments received from persons or agencies that reviewed the EIR. <br />In accordance with CEQA, each public agency and interested party that commented on the draft <br />EIR was provided with a response to its comments at least 10 days prior to the Planning <br />Commission public hearing. The Responses to Comments document, the Mitigation Monitoring <br />Program and the Draft EIR constitute the Final EIR for The Heritage (Exhibit 11). Given there are <br />some unavoidable and adverse impacts generated from the proposed project, which are discussed <br />in greater detail below, Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations have been <br />prepared for the project. <br />The EIR identified two significant unavoidable impacts associated with this project. These impacts <br />pertain to air quality and traffic and transportation. Unavoidable air quality impacts consist of long- <br />term emissions of reactive organic gases (ROG) and nitrogen dioxide (Nox) that would result from <br />the vehicle trips generated from the project that would exceed the applicable thresholds <br />established by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Traffic and <br />transportation impacts include significant impacts to four intersections and four SR -55 freeway <br />ramps. Although the developer will contribute its fair share amount of funds to mitigate traffic <br />generated by the project, there is no specific funding program or construction time frame for these <br />improvements. Further, the improvements are not under the approval and enforcement jurisdiction <br />of the City as they involve coordination with the Cities of Tustin and Irvine as well as Caitrans. <br />75A -10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.