Laserfiche WebLink
Section 6 <br />Project and Project Alternatives would also, riot result in temporary or permanent <br />impacts to Wetland Waters of the U.S-/State or Waters of the U.S./State. <br />Therefore, the Proposed Project and Project Alternatives would not be <br />contributing considerably to cumulative impacts that would result in the <br />permanent loss of Wetland Waters or Waters of the US/ State. Proposed <br />development projects in the project area would be required to evaluate potential <br />impacts to sensitive biological resources and would be required to provide <br />rneasures to minimize impacts and to biological resources and to ensure that <br />there would be no net loss of Waters of the U.S./State. By requiring the <br />evaluation of potential impacts to biological resources arid including measures to <br />avoid impacts biological resources, potential significant cumulative impacts to <br />biological resources would be reduced to a less than significant level. <br />Cultural Resources <br />The project area has been investigated for the presence of cultural resources <br />and it has been determined that the potential for cultural resources to be <br />encountered within the project area would be low. Mitigation measures have <br />been incorporated into the Proposed Project and Project Alternatives to avoid <br />potential significant impacts to unknown cultural resources in the event they are <br />encountered during construction activities. Proposed development projects in the <br />project area would be required to evaluate the potential for impacts to cultural <br />resources and under CEQA would be required to ensure that those project <br />activities would not result in adverse impacts to cultural resources. By requiring <br />the evaluation of potential impacts to cultural resources and including measures <br />to avoid impacts to unknown buried cultural resources, potential significant <br />cumulative impacts to cultural resources would be reduced to a less than <br />significant level. <br />Geology <br />Implementation of the Proposed Project and Project Alternatives would not result <br />in adverse geologic impacts that would expose people and structures to <br />substantial geologic risks. Therefore, the Proposed Project and Project <br />Alternatives would not contribute considerably to significant adverse cumulative <br />geologic impacts in the project area. Proposed development in the project area <br />would be required to prepared geotechnical studies to identify potential geologic <br />constraints and include measures to ensure geologic stability. With the <br />preparation and implementation of geotechnical studies, potential geologic <br />related cumulative iimpacts would be reduce to a less than significant level, <br />I L Mid Basin Centennial Park tQnf 4 Project Final EIR' 6-6 <br />- 6 <br />