Laserfiche WebLink
Method of Assessment Spread <br />Background <br />The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to the provisions of the <br />Assessment Law, must be based on the special benefit that the properties receive from the works of <br />improvement. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment <br />district proceedings. The responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is retained for the purpose of <br />making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. <br />The Assessment Engineer then makes his recommendation at the public hearing on the Assessment <br />District, and the final authority and decision rests with the City Council of the City. After hearing all testimony <br />and evidence presented at that public hearing, and upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council must <br />make the final decision determining whether or not the assessment spread has been made in direct proportion to <br />the special benefits received. <br />AnalysisMeeomntended Financing Mechanism <br />The purpose of the assessment methodology is to determine the proportionate amount of the assessment <br />to be assessed to each parcel of land based on special benefits received by each parcel. For purposes of this <br />study the following options, which are commonly used in the public finance industry, were considered: <br />Street Frontage. The street frontage is defined as the length of the side of a parcel that is directly <br />adjacent to the street. The street frontage method is a direct measure of the static utilization of each parcel and <br />its corresponding special benefit proposed from the street improvement. A common way of apportioning costs to <br />a parcel for assessment financing is to apply the cost based on the street frontage. However, this methodology <br />works best when the area under consideration is comprised of parcels with mostly uniform depths, so that the <br />parcel sizes are fairly consistent with their street frontage. Examples of the size versus frontage diversity in the <br />Warner Industrial Community (WIC) is shown in the following examples: two properties have approximately 30 <br />feet of frontage and one is 0.5 acres and the other is 2.8 acres; another two properties have approximately 125 <br />feet of frontage and one is 0.4 acres and the other is 1.2 acres. Also, the WIC includes parcels that take access <br />from private access easements and therefore have no frontage on the improved roadways, but still receive <br />special benefit from the improvements. Another issue with this methodology is that comer properties fronting on <br />two interior streets would carry an additional burden based on both sides of the parcel being counted. Due to the <br />reasons above, utilizing this method is not recommended. <br />Traffic Generation. The amount of traffic generated by each parcel is a direct measure of the special <br />benefit received. This can be determined in terms of trips per day (average daily traffic or ADT) using industry <br />standard factors per acre based on the land use of the parcel. A drawback to this methodology is that the actual <br />land use of each parcel is difficult to determine and may change in the future, which is important since the bond <br />term is anticipated to be up to 20 years. ADT does not characterize the spatial patterns of demand either. Based <br />on the City's general plan, this area is typically industrial and /or commercial; and the ADT factors that can be <br />utilized are typically based on employees and /or customers for industrial and commercial land use. Accurate <br />employee counts can be generated from acreage only if specific industrial or commercial land use categories are <br />known. Since a warehouse would generate far fewer trips than a manufacturing or retail -type use this poses <br />potential problems (due to inequities) in determining the appropriate assessment. Due to the reasons above, <br />utilizing this method is not recommended. <br />Parcel Area. The size of a parcel (in square feet or acres) is a direct measure of current and future <br />development capacity of each parcel and its corresponding special benefit received from street improvements. <br />This methodology works well when there is a large diversity of parcel sizes, shapes and frontage within a <br />specific area. The more a property can be developed, the more it specially benefits from the proposed <br />improvements. There is a direct correlation between the size of a property and the extent to which a property <br />MI.* <br />