Laserfiche WebLink
reviewed. The work will examine the configuration, capacity, utilization, security levels, and <br />custody arrangements of the facility's existing area space including (a) administration, (b) <br />visiting / lobby / public areas, (c) food services, (d) central control, (e) maintenance 1 storage / <br />utilities, (f) laundry, (g) intake / release, (h) medical / mental health clinics, (i) programs / <br />classrooms, (j) housing 1 dayrooms, (k) interior circulation, (1) indoor recreation (gym), (m) <br />vehicle sallyport, and (n) quasi -outdoor circulation / recreation yards. <br />Space Assessments: Based on the defined area uses identified for the City jail, an assessment <br />of the adequacy of each space will also be undertaken which takes into account factors <br />Including (a) appropriate size, (b) efficiency / organization, (c) expansion characteristics, (d) <br />circulation, (e) location, (f) adjacencies, and (g) level of privacy. Overall conclusions about the <br />adequacy of the facility and its space provisions will focus on standard jail building security <br />design criteria as well as the systems needed to support the operation of a detention facility. <br />The assessment information is intended to identify any significant issues concerning the <br />adequacy of the existing space and custody 1 housing levels associated with detainee <br />populations incarcerated in the facility. <br />Task 4. identify and analyze fail rouse options for City consideration. <br />Using the information and results assembled in the previous planning tasks, the Vanir consultant team will <br />work with the City to finalize 3 — 4 draft options which will be further evaluation with recommendations <br />provided to the community. The analysis, evaluation work, and recommendations will include: <br />■ Detailed Description of Options: A written comprehensive narrative description will be <br />developed for each draft jail reuse option the consultants identified and analyzed during the <br />scope of the project work. Each description will include graphic layouts highlighting the design <br />plans and concepts incorporated into the reuse option. <br />■ Other Contractinra Out Options: In order to provide the City with a comprehensive analysis, the <br />consultant team will review with qualified national correctional firms, including the Federal <br />Bureau of Prisons, the process, procedures, and likely success the City can expect if it pursued <br />arrangements with other outside custody agencies who may be interested in operating the City <br />jail. This information will be included in the evaluation of each jail reuse option. <br />■ Fiscal Analysis: An in-depth fiscal analysis will also be prepared which includes information <br />showing the overall fiscal impact the City will likely incur if the jail reuse option is pursued and <br />ultimately implemented. <br />■ Community Study Lou: The consultant team will work with City stakeholders and identified <br />interested advocates to establish and carry out an organized community meeting to gather <br />public input, concerns, and other potential impacts associated with the jail reuse options the <br />City is evaluating. The consultant team will use the public input information in finalizing the <br />published information showing the advantages and disadvantages of each reuse option. <br />■ Consultant Recommendations: The consultant team will develop a summary outline of the <br />pros and cons and advantages /disadvantages identified in the course of the study for each of <br />the jail reuse options. Analysis of this information and related fiscal impact data will be used <br />to form the recommendations the consultant team is prepared to present to the City Council. <br />Task 5. Rrep+are fail rause options final report. <br />After the draft Jail Reuse Planning and Feasibility Study has been reviewed and approved by the City's <br />administrative staff, copies of the report will be prepared and presented to the City Council. <br />