Laserfiche WebLink
OCTA I July 2016 r�� <br />VIASupplement J <br />foundational supports. Similar to the approved LPA, no major lighting is proposed. As a <br />result, the re -positioning of the bridge to the north would result in less of an obstruction <br />than compared to the approved LPA. For this reason, this bridge design modification <br />would not substantially alter the visual character of the project vicinity and no adverse <br />effect/significant impact would result. <br />Figure 6 — Santa Ana River Bridge (Modified Project) — North Facing <br />Figure 7 presents the visual simulation for the modified bridge crossing as could be viewed <br />from the north of the bridge (i.e. south -facing). As depicted, this minor modification would <br />result in similar visual affects to the approved LPA and would functionally shift these <br />affects from the south to the north of the Old Pacific Electric Santa Ana River Bridge. <br />Given that the modified bridge design has not substantially changed since the approval of <br />the LPA in 2015 and the re -positioning of the bridge would result in less visual impact <br />when compared to the approved LPA, no substantial changes in the significance <br />determinations provided in the 2015 EA would result. For this reason, the minor design <br />modifications to the Santa Ana River Bridge fall within the scope of analysis for the 2015 <br />EA and remain not adverse/less than significant. No visual impact was identified in the <br />2015 EA; therefore, this project feature would not result in a new adverse/significant visual <br />91 Page <br />