P & D CONSULTANTS - 2002 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Grand Avenue Widening Project Environmental Impact Report Section 1.0 TABLE 1-3 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS FROM THE SCOPING MEETING Comment IS/EIR Sections Where Comment Is Addressed • Audience was not told they have 30 days to submit • The 30 day comment period is associated with the NOP comments. issued by the City on May 13, 1998. Attendees at the scoping meeting may submit comments at any time prior to the completion of the draft EIR. In addition, many. attendees were told, in conversations with the City and consultant staff, that there would be additional hearing on the proposed project and that they would be notified of those opportunities to comment on the project. • Does not want the project segment of Grand Avenue • EIR Section 1.1.4 (Description of the No Project widened. Alternative). • Compensation for business impacts. • EIR Section 3.2 Land Use and Planning). • Concerned regarding the loss of business signing at the • This is not an environmental issue under CEQA. It will street edge. be addressed by the City during the property acquisition haseofthe ro osed project. • Concerned regarding the potential effect of the proposed • This is not an environmental issue under CEQA. widening on property values. • Concerned regarding potentia] effects on a long term • This is not an environmental issue under CEQA. If lease currently being negotiated by a property owner. appropriate, it will be addressed by the City during the roperty ac uisition hase of the proposed project. Executive Summary. This section summarizes the project alternatives and the potential environmental impacts of the alternatives. Section 1.0. This section summarizes the project alternatives, the project objectives and the CEQA process for the proposed project. Section 2.0. This section summarizes the environmental impacts found not to be significant based on the analysis provided in the IS. Section 3.0. This section describes the existing conditions, the thresholds of significance, the analytical methodology, the impacts of the widening alternatives, mitigation to reduce or avoid any significant adverse impacts, and the level of significance of the impacts after mitigation for the environmental parameters determined in the IS to potentially result in significant adverse impacts. Section 4.0. This section summarizes the potential significant unavoidable adverse impacts of the project alternatives, after mitigation, based on the analysis documented in Section 3.0. Section 5.0. This section addresses the potential for irretrievable and irreversible commitment of resources associated with the project alternatives. Section 6.0. This section addresses the potential for growth inducing and cumulative impacts associated with the project alternatives. Section 7.0. This section provides the MMP for the proposed Grand Avenue widening. F: IPRO.I-ENVIGrand eirlNew Text - GrandlSection 1.0 -new. doe Page 1-20