Laserfiche WebLink
RNVIRONMP. NTAL IMCAII T RRRORT AOORNDOM ARMSTRONG RANCH 0.CVI9¢D,TROJ¢.G7 <br />%RPTRMRLR 1111 - SANTA ANA. GALITOANIA' <br />outlined in the City's General Plamreiated to residential development. The Certified EIR also <br />concluded altar; the Approved Project would be compatible iwith surrounding uses, which include <br />lone- andimotiemte-densityresidential developments. No new mitigation trieasures are required. <br />Zonhtg Ordinance. The;Citv's Zoning Ordinance is the primary impleinetifatio i tool for its <br />General Plan Land Use Element and the goals and policies contained therein. its such, the Zoning <br />Mapmustbe consistent with the General Plan Land Use Map. The Land Use Mapindicates the <br />general location and extent of future land use in the City. The Zoning Ordinance, which includes <br />the Zoning Map, contains more detailed information about permitted land uses, building <br />intensities, and required development standards. <br />The current zoning district on the'1'roject site is SD4. The Revised Project would develop a new <br />Church facility on an' existing Chu reLsLite; wIhich would replace the existing on-site'use with the <br />samense. Thcxcsidential component df the Revised Project would be consistent with allowable <br />uses within SD -4, which allows for crop agriculture and single-family residential uses. SD -4 is a <br />precise plan, adopted by ordinance that provides the means for tine regulation of buildings, <br />strrcrures; and uses of land in order to facilitate the implementation of the General Plan.17he <br />regulations of SD -4 are intended,to'gutde land use on the site while ensuring corn pliance with the: <br />provisions of tile Municipal Code: Therefore, the Revised Projectivould result.in less than <br />significant impacts with respect to inconsistcneies with the City's Zoning Ordinance.'l'he <br />Revised Project will require an amendment to 9134 to allow ror.development of a,gundI lot <br />subdtvisioa. "Che only other discretionary:approval identi tied by the City that would be required <br />for die project is.a tentative tract map. <br />Per the reasons outlined above, the Revised Project would be consistent with. applicable <br />documents regulating land use on the Project site, and no mitigation is required, The Revised <br />Project would not result in new significant impacts beyond those identified in the C_enifed EiR_ <br />No new mitigation measures are:regitired. <br />C) The Project site is not located within the Orange County. Central -Coastal Natural Coiiiniunities <br />Conservation P1aalHabital Conservation flan (NCCP/HCP). lberefore, there are no adopted <br />I1CP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation -plans that apply to <br />the Project site and the Revised Project would not conflict with the NCCP orIICP and no- <br />mitigation <br />omitigation is required. Therefore; the Revised Project would not result in new significant hupacts <br />beyond those identified in the Certified EIR. No new mitigation measures are required. <br />Mitigation Measures: <br />No mitigation is required. <br />findings Related to Land Use and Planning: <br />No New Significant Effects Requiring.Major Certified EIR Revisions. Based on tate foregoing <br />analysis and information, there is no cVidence that project modifications require a major change to the <br />Certified EIR_ The project changes will act result in new significant environmental impacts related to <br />P:'.SHOIfi6d+Aik]enitumLldt�eadnm.elGc'x 49:0513 i,, <br />75B-98 <br />2-49 <br />