My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25A - AGMT - COMPREHENSIVE REPORT OF PROP 218 FEES
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
10/03/2017
>
25A - AGMT - COMPREHENSIVE REPORT OF PROP 218 FEES
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2017 4:57:27 PM
Creation date
9/28/2017 4:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
25A
Date
10/3/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECENT NBS PROJECT EXPERIENCE <br />Within the last three (3) years as Director of NBS' Financial Consulting practice, Nicole Kissam <br />has managed and completed the following relevant projects to the Scope of Services proposed in <br />this document: <br />• Association of Bay Area Governments <br />(ABAG), Indirect Cost Allocation Plan <br />Review <br />• Chula Vista, Cost Allocation Plan <br />Review and User Fee Study Analysis <br />• Clear Lake, Cost Allocation Plan <br />• Contra Costa County, User and <br />Regulatory Analysis Review <br />• Dixon, Cost Allocation Plan <br />• East Palo Alto, Cost Allocation Plan and <br />Comprehensive Fee and Rate Study <br />• Eastvale, Development Impact Fee <br />Study <br />• Fresno, Fire Prevention User Fee <br />Analysis <br />• Indio, Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee <br />Study <br />• Los Angeles,.Expedited Review Fees for <br />the Department of City Planning <br />• Napa, Cost Allocation Plan and User <br />Fee Study <br />• Petaluma, Cost Allocation Plan and <br />Internal Service Fund Rate Review <br />Portola Valley, Community Development <br />User Fee Analysis <br />• Richmond, User Fee Analysis for <br />Engineering, Code Enforcement and <br />Medical Marijuana. <br />• San Luis Obispo, Building Department <br />User Fee Analysis <br />• San Carlos, Citywide User Fee Study, <br />Police False Alarm Analysis, Sewer <br />Financial Pian and Rate Update <br />Recommendations <br />• Sausalito, User Fee Study (in progress) <br />• Taft, Cost Allocation Plan and User Fee <br />Study <br />• Turlock, Building Fee Study <br />• Sacramento Public Library Authority, <br />Cost Allocation Plan <br />• Santa Clara County Environmental <br />Health Department, User Fee and Fund <br />Balance Analysis <br />HISTORICAL PROJECT EXPERIENCE <br />Ms. Kissam was the project manager and lead analyst for the following engagements as Vice <br />President for the Matrix Consulting Group: <br />• Arcata, Building Fee Analysis <br />• Atwater, Building Fee Analysis <br />Centre City Development Corporation <br />(San Diego), Planning Fee Analysis <br />Elk Grove, Overhead Cost Allocation <br />Plan <br />• Fresno, Development Services Fee <br />Analysis <br />• Manteca, User Fee Analysis <br />• Marin County Community Development <br />Agency, Fee Analysis <br />• Maui County, Planning Department Fee <br />Analysis <br />• Petaluma, Citywide Cost Allocation Plan <br />and User Fee Analysis <br />• Richmond, Citywide Cost Allocation Plan <br />and User Fee Analysis for Planning and <br />Building <br />• City/County of San Francisco, Dept of. <br />Building Inspection Fee Analysis <br />• San Jose, Land Development/ <br />Engineering Fee Analysis <br />• Sunnyvale, Development Services Fee <br />Analysis <br />• Temecula, Citywide User Fee Analysis <br />%, )f 1moi- City of Santa Ana <br />ys� 1 �l B RFP No. 17-081 Comprehensive Proposition 218 Fees and Charges Compliance Assessment <br />25A-54 <br />38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.