Laserfiche WebLink
2. The City has received 29 applications so far this year <br />3. The City does not have a GF ordinance in place <br />4. The City has been implementing the State "mandated" ordinance <br />How City intends to address GF <br />1. Staff will take feedback they have been receiving from the community and the impacts of GF currently <br />spread throughout the neighborhoods <br />2. Staff will then draft a local ordinance to put before the.planning Commission in Oct:/Nov, and then before <br />the City Council in Nov./Dec. <br />'3. "Well before then.." Staff will have a draft ready for public review and input "to refine that ordinance" <br />Concerns of residents in attendance <br />1. "When Is the draft coming out? It doesn't look like there will be much time for public comment." <br />Staff response: We hope to have that available for review (by Com -Link) spmetime next month <br />(September) and it will be posted to the City website. <br />2. "Can we have a committee to meet with you, instead of us -listening to what is happening up at City Hall"? <br />"How are you going to hear from us."? <br />Staff response: "We'll explore different ways to get as much input from the community has we can - and <br />then once we develop a strategy to get that input we'll relay that to you guys here." <br />3. "What are you doing to get the information outto the community"? <br />Staff response: This Is step one. <br />4. There was continued concerns from residents on the short time frame for public input. <br />Staff response: "We heard your concerns in many previous meetings." <br />Note: To my personal knowledge there were only two neighborhood meetings (other than C_ om-Link) where <br />GF was addressed — and staff could name only one such meeting. <br />There were one or two Council sub, committee meetings at which GF was discussed. <br />Further staff response: "we are willing to do that again" and "We will use Neighborhood Improvement <br />to reach out to you." <br />2 <br />75D-33 <br />