Laserfiche WebLink
$230,000. The median amount of cash savings held by renters was <br />similarly low at just $800, compared with $7,300 for owners. <br />The discrepancy in wealth is even greater among households headed <br />by adults age 65 and over, who generally need to draw down their <br />assets in retirement. The median net wealth of older renters was <br />$6,700 in 2016, compared with a median for older homeowners of <br />$319,200. Not all of this difference is due to housing wealth, however. <br />The non -housing wealth of renters in all age groups is also several <br />times lower than that of homeowners. <br />THE GEOGRAPHY OF RENTING <br />The 2016 American Community Survey indicates that just under <br />half (46 percent) of all renter households reside in principal cities of <br />metropolitan areas. By comparison, about a quarter (26 percent) of <br />homeowner households live in these locations. <br />Among the nation's 100 largest metro areas, the highest rentership rates <br />are in high-cost markets such as Los Angeles (S2 percent) and New York <br />City (49 percent), as well as in fast-growing areas such as Las Vegas (49 <br />percent) and Austin (42 percent). The shares of renters are much smaller <br />in low-cost and slow -growth areas like Detroit (32 percent), Grand Rapids <br />(29 percent), and Pittsburgh (31 percent). Rentership rates are also <br />relatively low in metros with large shares of older householders, such as <br />Cape Coral, Deltona, and several other Florida metros, consistent with <br />the high homeownership rates among this age group. <br />Higher -income households are more apt to rent in high-cost hous- <br />ing markets (Figure 12). This makes the renter population in these <br />areas somewhat more economically diverse than the US average. <br />However, these metros still have large numbers of low-income <br />renters and the highest rates of renting among low-income <br />households. <br />Given their greater income diversity, renters in high-cost metros <br />are also more diverse in terms of household type. Nearly half (45 <br />percent) of all married couples with children that live in Los Angeles <br />and San Diego rent their housing. By comparison, the share of mar- <br />ried couples with children that rent is just 15 percent in Pittsburgh <br />and 18 percent in Philadelphia. At the same time, high-cost markets <br />tend to have larger shares of nontraditional households, which may <br />include extra workers to help afford the high rents. For example, <br />households with three or more adults made up 13 percent of renter <br />households nationally in 2015, but 23 percent in the Los Angeles <br />metro area. <br />RENTING THROUGH THE LIFECYCLE <br />The vast majority of households rent at some point in their lives. <br />According to a JCHS analysis of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics <br />(PSID), about half (49 percent) of owners under age 60 in 2015 had <br />been renters at some point within the previous 20 years. Among <br />owners under age 50, the share was even higher at nearly three- <br />quarters (72 percent). <br />Renting Is More Common in High -Cost Housing Markets, Especially Among Higher -Income Households <br />Rentership Rate(Percent) <br />ag <br />70 <br />so <br />50 <br />40 <br />30 <br />20 <br />19 <br />Loss the o$15,000 $15,990-29,999 439,000-44,,999 $45,00074,999 $75,000 or More Total <br />Household Income <br />Largest 100 Mottos ®10 Highest Cost Mottos 0 Middle 30 Metros L�i 10 LowesFCost Mottos NBest of US <br />Nom'. Mottos aro the bar mount by paper I at on 45 dullard in the 2016 Amu rican Community Survry. <br />Somce'. JCHS tabulations of US Doasus Bureau. 2616 American Community Survey i Year Estimates using the Missouri Census Data Center MABLF/Gerro04, <br />