My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attached and included as a supplement to this letter are several reports on the rental housing market <br />and more specifically the Impact of rent control. While I encourage you to review the data and utilize it <br />In the course of your research, we have summarized some of the key points for you below. <br />America's Rental Housing 2017 — December 2017; Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard <br />University <br />■ Slowdown in rent growth has occurred in markets across the country, but is most evident in <br />metros where multifamily construction had been the strongest. <br />• Vacancy rates are up over the past year In 94 of the 100 metros tracked by industry research <br />house Realpage. <br />■ The need for housing assistance continues to grow. From 2001 to 2015, HUD's Worst Case <br />Housing Needs 2017 Report to Congress shows that in a time where 600k more people received <br />rental assistance, the number of people needing assistance exceeded 4.3 million. <br />• Subsidized housing is at risk of loss either due to under -maintenance or expiring affordability <br />periods. Public housing is particularly under threat, with a backlog of repairs in excess of $26 <br />billion dollars as of 2010. <br />• Rental housing demand has grown at an unprecedented pace over the last decade. This surge in <br />rental households replaced a decade where rental housing saw decreased demand (94.04). <br />• This decade has seen an increase in high earning renters, also known as renters by choice. <br />Households age 50 and over accounted for more than half of the recent surge in renters. <br />• Although rental trends and rates vary, 2017 saw the third consecutive year over year decline in <br />growth rates from 5.6% in 2015 to 4.7% in 2016 and now 2.7% in 2017. This growth has allowed <br />property owners to reinvest in their units, as discretionary spending or capital expenditures <br />increased by more than 10% or $1,486 per unit over that timeframe. <br />• Growth in renter incomes has outpaced the rise in housing casts since 2011 in all income <br />quartlles. <br />The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords and Inequality: Evidence from San <br />Francisco—October 2017; Rebecca Diamond, Tim McQuade and Franklin Qian at Stanford University <br />• Rent control spurs high-end new development and owner -occupied housing that likely fueled <br />the gentrification of San Francisco as these housing types cater mostly to higher income <br />individuals. <br />• From 1995 to 2012, the per person benefit to residents of rent controlled buildings was <br />between $2,300 and $6,600 each year, with aggregate benefits of more than $393 million <br />dollars annually. Substantial welfare losses due to decreased housing supply could be mitigated <br />if insurance against large rent increases was provided as a form of government social insurance, <br />instead of as a regulated mandate on landlords. <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.