My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
02/06/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - WS-1 OPPOSITION
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/8/2018 8:34:51 AM
Creation date
2/6/2018 8:53:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
WS-1
Date
2/6/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• A 6% decrease in housing supply led to a 7% Increase in rental prices, causing an aggregate <br />welfare loss to renters of $5 billion dollars. The Increased rents are the result of a decreased <br />supply of housing. <br />• Landlords are found to respond to rent control by converting their properties to condos, TICS or <br />by redeveloping their buildings in such a way that it becomes exempt from rent control <br />restrictions. In doing so, supply was decreased by an additional 15%. <br />• Since 1994, tenants of rent controlled buildings received over $7.1 billion in benefits, mostly the <br />results of being bought out or paid to leave. The losses to renters are in excess of $5 billion as <br />the result of rent control's impact on decreased housing supply, failure to build and the <br />subsequent increase in market rental rates. These results highlight that forcing landlords to <br />provide social insurance against rent increases leads to large losses to tenants over time. <br />• If society desires to provide social insurance against rent Increases, it would be more desirable <br />to offer this subsidy in the form of a government subsidy or tax credit. This would remove the <br />landlords' incentives to decrease housing supply and provide each household with the Insurance <br />they desire. <br />Yup, Rent Control Does More Harm Than Good —January 2018; Noah Smith, Assistant Professor at <br />Stony Brook University and Columnist at Bloomberg (A Summary of the Stanford Study) <br />■ Assar Lindbeck, a Swedish economist who chaired the Nobel prize committee for many years, <br />once reportedly declared that rent control is "the best way to destroy a city, other than <br />bombing." <br />How Rent Control Drives Out Affordable Housing — May 1997; William Tucker of the CATO Institute <br />• Standard supply and demand theory predicts that any price controls, Including rent control, will <br />produce an excess of demand over supply — resulting in an economic "shortage". These is <br />virtually no disagreement on this premise. <br />• In a survey, 75 leading economists, JR Kearl and his colleagues found that "a ceiling on rents will <br />reduce the quality and quantity of housing". <br />• Rent or price controls rarely work in a straightforward fashion as it is virtually impossible for a <br />government to control and regulate the entire supply of a commodity. Once a shortage <br />appears, alternative markets and black markets will arise. The government can react and <br />criminalize or prosecute these markets, though extreme enforcement will result in an additional <br />decrease in the availability of suitable, rentable housing stock. <br />• Prices get pushed too low in the regulated sector; they Increase in the unregulated sector and as <br />a result, they are forced higher and tend to end up about as a high as their otherwise free- <br />market levels. <br />• Rent controlled apartments are "hoarded" and creates the perception of a housing crisis in rent - <br />controlled cities. <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.