My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 10:01:52 AM
Creation date
6/20/2019 8:39:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-040
Date
6/4/2019
Destruction Year
P
Document Relationships
2019-041 - Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01
(Amended By)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\2011 -\2019
NS-2967 - Approving Development Agreement No. 2018-02 Between City of Santa Ana and Mainplace ShoppingTown, LLC for Mainplace Mall Transformation Project
(Amended By)
Path:
\Ordinances\2011 - 2020 (NS-2813 - NS-3000)\2019 (NS-2963 - NS-2978
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2935
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana Addendum to the <br />MainPlace Mall Transformation Proiect Fashion Square Commercial Center Final EIR <br />change of commercial tenant space during implementation of the Project is not an <br />environmental issue under CEQA. Further, no tenants are anticipated to be displaced <br />by construction of the Project. Thus, Mitigation Measure 5.1-1(b) is not applicable to the <br />proposed Project. <br />Conclusion for Land Use <br />No new or substantially greater land use impacts would occur with implementation of <br />the proposed Project when compared to those identified in the 1983 EIR or the 1996 <br />Addendum. The proposed Project would result in fewer land use impacts than those <br />identified in 1983 EIR and similar less than significant impacts to those cited in the 1996 <br />Addendum. <br />Based on the foregoing, none of the conditions identified in CEQA Guidelines section <br />15162 that trigger the need to prepare a subsequent or supplemental EIR, or other <br />environmental document to evaluate Project impacts or mitigation measures exist <br />regarding land use. There have not been 1) changes to the Project that require major <br />revisions of the previous adopted EIR due to the involvement of new significant <br />environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified <br />effects; 2) substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the <br />Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the previous adopted EIR due to <br />the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the <br />severity of previously identified effects; or 3) the availability of new information of <br />substantial importance relating to significant effects or mitigation measures or <br />alternatives that were not known and could not have been known when the 1983 EIR <br />was adopted as completed. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />The mitigation measures from the 1983 EIR are listed below. Explanations are provided <br />as to the status and applicability of each. <br />MM 5.1-1(a) The Project should be landscaped similar to or more extensive than the <br />existing landscaping in order to buffer the development from surrounding <br />residential areas as much as possible. [Status: Continuing applicability <br />to this Project] <br />MM5.1-1(b) All tenants displaced by the Project will be provided assistance in <br />accordance with State law and Santa Ana Redevelopment Agency <br />policies. [Status: Completed/not applicable to this Project] <br />MM5.1-1(c) The Agency and the Project Participants should offer KLST [the former <br />property owner of the 2700 Main Street parcel] land (including the Agency <br />owned land to the south of the Fidelity Savings Building and a portion of <br />the Project site in the near vicinity at fair market value (or fair rent, if a <br />lease arrangement is preferred) in trade-off against the acquisition of <br />Sales Parcels 3 and 5. The land area so offered should be sufficient to <br />51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.