My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-040 - Mainplace Mall Transformation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2019 10:01:52 AM
Creation date
6/20/2019 8:39:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-040
Date
6/4/2019
Destruction Year
P
Document Relationships
2019-041 - Approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-01
(Amended By)
Path:
\Resolutions\CITY COUNCIL\2011 -\2019
NS-2967 - Approving Development Agreement No. 2018-02 Between City of Santa Ana and Mainplace ShoppingTown, LLC for Mainplace Mall Transformation Project
(Amended By)
Path:
\Ordinances\2011 - 2020 (NS-2813 - NS-3000)\2019 (NS-2963 - NS-2978
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2935
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana Addendum to the <br />MainPlace Mall Transformation Proiect Fashion Square Commercial Center Final EIR <br />5.4 BIOTA/BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the 1983 EIR <br />The 1983 EIR describes that the site is located in an urban environment and vegetation <br />onsite and adjacent to the site consists of ornamental trees, shrubs, and grasses. The <br />EIR describes that only small ground mammals that are tolerant of urban activities and <br />birds that may use onsite trees for nesting and roosting places are able to survive <br />onsite. <br />The 1983 EIR describes that construction on the site would force any onsite birds or <br />mammals to move to outlying areas, but that after construction is complete, and the site <br />is re -landscaped, the urban wildlife would likely return. The 1983 EIR identifies one <br />Mitigation Measure 5.4-1, which requires that the Project provide adequate landscaping <br />onsite, and requires City review and approval of all landscaping plans. The 1983 EIR <br />determined that no substantial adverse biological impacts would result from <br />redevelopment of the site. <br />Summary of Impacts Identified in the 1996 Addendum <br />The 1996 Addendum describes that the site is entirely developed, and vegetation is <br />comprised of introduced ornamental trees, shrubs and grasses. Consistent with the <br />1983 EIR, the 1996 Addendum states that no native vegetation exists onsite and that no <br />impacts would occur from the proposed expansion. In addition, the Addendum <br />describes that the City requires decorative landscaping as part of the final plan approval <br />process. <br />Impacts Associated with the Proposed Project <br />No New Impact. Similar to the site conditions in 1983 and 1996, the Project site is <br />developed and located within an urban environment. The Project site has no natural <br />habitats onsite and no connectivity to natural habitats. Vegetation on the Project site is <br />limited to ornamental vegetation, which includes trees, shrubs, and grasses. Urban <br />wildlife species, including small mammals and birds, have the potential to exist within <br />the landscaped areas on the site. No endangered, rare, threatened, or special status <br />plant species (or associated habitats) or wildlife species designated by the U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or <br />California Native Plant Society (CNPS) are known to occur on the site. Thus, none <br />would be impacted by implementation of the proposed Project. No new impact would <br />occur. <br />As described in the 1983 EIR, any small urban mammals would move off the site at the <br />commencement of construction. In addition, nesting birds that could utilize the <br />ornamental trees onsite are protected by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which <br />requires that nesting birds be protected and that trees with nesting birds not be removed <br />until the fledglings have left the nest. Thus, impacts to small mammals and birds would <br />61 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.