My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-050 -Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2019
>
2019-050 -Adopting Local CEQA Guidelines
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2023 4:54:33 PM
Creation date
6/24/2019 8:39:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2019-050
Date
6/18/2019
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Guidelines for Implementing the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (2019) INITIAL STUDY <br /> <br />The significance of a historical resource is materially impaired when a project: <br />(a) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a <br />historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, <br />or eligibility for inclusion in, the California Register of Historical Resources; <br />(b) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that <br />account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources or its identification in a <br />historical resources survey, unless the Lead Agency establishes by a preponderance of <br />evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or <br />(c) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a <br />historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for <br />inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources as determined by the Lead <br />Agency for purposes of CEQA. <br />Generally, a project that follows either one of the following sets of standards and <br />guidelines will be considered mitigated to a level of less than significant: (a) the Secretary of the <br />Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings; or (b) the Secretary of the <br /> Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings <br />(1995), Weeks and Grimmer. <br />In the event of an accidental discovery of a possible historical resource during <br />construction of the project, the City may provide for the evaluation of the find by a qualified <br />archaeologist or other professional. If the find is determined to be a historical resource, the City <br />should take appropriate steps to implement appropriate avoidance or mitigation measures. Work <br />on non-affected portions of the project, as determined by the City, may continue during the <br />process. Curation may be an appropriate mitigation measure for an artifact that must be removed <br />during project excavation or testing. <br />5.15 E VALUATING I MPACTS ON A RCHAEOLOGICAL S ITES. <br />When a project will impact an archaeological site, the City shall first determine whether <br />the site is a historical resource, as defined in Local Guidelines Section 11.28 If the <br />archaeological site is a historical resource, it shall be treated and evaluated as such, and not as an <br />archaeological resource. If the archaeological site does not meet the definition of a historical <br />resource, but does meet the definition of a unique archaeological resource set forth in Public <br />Resources Code Section 21083.2, the site shall be treated in accordance with said provisions of <br />the Public Resources Code. The time and cost limitations described in Section 21083.2(c-f) do <br />not apply to surveys and site evaluation activities intended to determine whether the project site <br />contains unique archaeological resources. <br />If the archaeological resource is neither a unique archaeological resource nor a historical <br />resource, the effects of the project on those resources shall not be considered a significant effect <br />on the environment. It shall be sufficient that both the resource and the effect on it are noted in <br />the Initial Study or EIR, if one is prepared to address impacts on other resources, but they need <br />not be considered further in the CEQA process. <br /> <br />2019 City of Santa Ana Local Guidelines 5-13 ©Best Best & Krieger LLP <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.