Laserfiche WebLink
One Broadway Plaza <br />Environmental Imvac <br />Findings and Facts in Support of Findings <br />4.1.5.3 Facts in Support of the Finding Related to Television Rece tp ion <br />For residential uses which do not have cable television, area television reception will be impacted <br />because the project will interfere with television transmission from area television stations. It is <br />anticipated that the proposed project will interfere with commercial and public station television <br />signals for those living south and east of the project site because these signals are transmitted from <br />hills in the Los Angeles northwest of the project site. This is an unavoidable adverse impact of the <br />project because 70 percent of Santa Ana residents rely on television antennas to receive broadcast <br />television signals. No mitigation for this impact is proposed. <br />4.1.5.4 Level of Significance of Impacts Related to Television Reception <br />The interference with television reception is an unavoidable adverse impact which cannot be <br />mitigated below a level of significance because mitigation is not possible. <br />4.1.6 Impacts Related to Aesthetics <br />4.1.6.1 Potentially Significant Adverse Impact Related to Aesthetics <br />As described in detail in Section 3.11 (Aesthetics) in the EIR, the One Broadway Plaza project <br />will result in adverse impacts in the areas of land use scale and shade, and shadow impact. <br />4.1.6.2 Finding Related to Aesthetics <br />Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, including provision of <br />employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or <br />project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br />4.1.6.3 Facts in Support of the Finding Related to Aesthetics <br />The 37-story office tower would exceed the height, mass and scale of existing structures on and near <br />the site. The contrast in height, mass and scale of the parking structure and tower relative to <br />existing buildings on and near the site cannot be mitigated. The contrast would be a significant <br />adverse visual impact on the site and surrounding area. <br />Residential uses in the areas north of Washington Avenue, east of Sycamore Street and west of <br />Broadway Street would be considered sensitive to additional amounts of shade because of the use of <br />the outdoor areas at these residences. Loss of sunlight would affect these uses during winter and <br />summer mornings and evenings. These areas will receive a half hour more of shade as the shadow <br />cast by the project office building and parking garage moves as the sun moves in the sky. During <br />the winter and summer months, this additional shading would be a significant adverse impact which <br />cannot be mitigated. <br />U/vJiegoso/wp51/reports/0ne Broadway final findings Page 16 <br />June 28, 2004 <br />