My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2019
>
10/15/2019
>
75A - PH KARA GRANT APPEAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2019 5:26:14 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 4:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
10/15/2019
Destruction Year
2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
450
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICE OF KARA E. GRANT <br />RK 15528 <br />Page 4 <br />7. As shown on page 3-82, the traffic study used the ITE (Institute of Transportation <br />Engineers) 9"' Edition of Trip Generation rates which was published in 2012. This <br />manual was updated in the ITE Trip generation, 1014 Edition published in 2017. The <br />latest manual should have been used for this study since both the original traffic <br />study and 2019 revised traffic study were done significantly after the new ITE Trip <br />Generation data was available. <br />8. The Express Car Wash Trip Generation shown on page 3-82 and Table 5-1 should <br />include a Saturday analysis. RK has collected traffic data at three Santa Ana Express <br />Car Wash sites and the Saturday trip generation is 50% greater than what was used <br />in the traffic study. The traffic study needs to include a Saturday traffic analysis for <br />each of the different timeframes which are evaluated. <br />9. For the Existing Plus Project and Future conditions analysis, a Saturday analysis <br />needs to be evaluated. as mentioned in Item #8. <br />10.On pages 3-86 and 3-87 (Figures 5-3 and 5-4), the project volumes do not seem to <br />match the project net trip generation in Table 5-1 and the Trip Distributions on <br />pages 3-84 and 3-85 (Figures 5-1 and 5-2) . It is not clear how the project only <br />volumes were calculated. Did they include the full project trip generation minus the <br />net trip generation for the existing uses? This is unclear in the text of the report and <br />could affect all of the traffic analysis for the future conditions with the project. <br />1 1.The traffic analysis shown on page 3-90 (Table 5-1) needs a Saturday analysis as <br />previously mentioned, because the proposed Express Car Wash generates more trips <br />during a Saturday than on a weekday. <br />12.The near -term traffic analysis shown on page 3-91 needs to be a more realistic year <br />than Year 2019, since Year 2019 is nearly aver. <br />13.On page 3-101, (Table 6-2) needs to use the more current ITE 1011' Edition Trip <br />Generation for all of the cumulative projects. <br />14. Page 3-105 (Table 8-1 ) and page 3-107 (Table 8-2) need to include a Saturday <br />analysis. <br />enolneerlm <br />919M Inc. <br />75A-70 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.