My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jeremy Ogulnick <br />August 5, 2020 <br />Page 9 <br />c) In addition to the minimum requirements of subsections (a) and (b) of this <br />section, each multiple -family dwelling site shall provide guest parking, <br />identified as such, in an amount of spaces not less than twenty-five (25%) <br />percent of the minimum required spaces under subsections (a) and (b) of this <br />section, but in no case less than three (3) spaces. <br />Table 4 presents the code parking requirement for the Project. Review of Table 4 <br />identifies that the Project would require 3,130 spaces, of which 626 spaces would be <br />required to accommodate the guest parking requirement. With a proposed parking <br />supply of 2,200 parking spaces, the Project is projected to have a theoretical parking <br />deficiency of 930 spaces (See Row F) when compared to the City's parking <br />requirements. <br />Although the Project's proposed parking supply is calculated to be deficient based on <br />City Code requirement, the following section provides details of a Project Parking <br />Management Plan (PMP) that could be implemented to manage the proposed <br />residential parking supply, calculated at 2.0 spaces per unit, to the actual parking <br />demand of the Project's residents, recognizing that the City Code requirement is <br />highly conservative when compared to the parking supply provided by similar <br />developments within the City of Santa Ana and other similar sites. <br />In addition to the Project's code -parking requirements, Table 4 also provides a <br />summary of the Project's composite parking supply ratios, in comparison to the <br />City's code composite supply ratio of 2.86 spaces/unit (See Row G: 3,130 spaces <br />1,100 units). As shown in Row H, the Project's proposed "constructed" on -site supply <br />ratio calculates to 1.75 spaces/unit (1,920 spaces - 1,100 units). <br />The Project's composite parking supply ratio father increases with implementation <br />of PMP measure no. 5 and no. 6, which would add an additional 117 tandem stall and <br />163 car lift spaces to the Project's supply. As shown in Row I and Row J of Table 4, <br />the Project's total composite parking ratio calculates to 1.85 spaces/unit (2,037 spaces <br />1,100 units) and 2.0 spaces/unit (2,200 spaces - 1,100 units), respectively. <br />Comparison of Parking Ratios <br />Notwithstanding the requirements of City Code, the actual parking requirements for <br />multifamily residential uses have been found to be less than the City's own Code <br />requirement. This aspect is illustrated by LLG's previous field studies of actual <br />parking demand at existing sites similar to the project, in addition to parking <br />demand/empirical ratio compilations from other sources. <br />Table 5 presents a comparison of site development and parking ratios from various <br />sources. The upper portion of Table 5 presents twelve (12) comparable sites in <br />N'.\42=2204T14-The Bowery, Santa Ma ,.ftk274 The Wam RedhillR2d5Q, 1}Q!'.ERZ,n mat Plan 08-05-2020. doer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.