Laserfiche WebLink
e. <br />and procedures for preparing effective compatibility planning <br />documents; and define exemptions where applicable (Caltrans, <br />2011)." The Handbook provides specific guidance for assessing <br />potential airspace obstructions in Section 4.5 Airspace Protection. <br />xii. JWA - The FAA requires airport sponsors like Orange County to <br />accept specific grant assurances when they accept federal <br />funding. Hazard Removal and Mitigation and Compatible Land <br />Use are two of these assurances (49 U.S.C. § 47107(a)(9) and <br />(10)). For hazard removal, the Airport relies on the FAA's <br />aeronautical study to meet its requnent. For compatible land <br />use, the Airport relies on coordin — with the surrounding cities <br />and the ALUC. The following auffilift specific assurances: <br />xiii. Hazard Removal and Mite. It wt�tke appropriate action to <br />assure that such tergg airspace SeAs required to protect <br />instrument and visMF�77operations to 'L airport (including <br />established minimum--�trht altitudes) will bequately cleared <br />and protected by rernM , low ng, reloca# r marking, or <br />lighting or 2MRrwise miti —ing airport Tw_ards and by <br />preventing tfblishment reation of future airport hazards. <br />xiv. Compatible La Us UbWWI take a opriate action, to the extent <br />reasanable, inci A-T.Mg th�ion dm ning laws, to restrict the <br />adjaceo or�I]�meda vicinity of the airport to <br />vities d purpo patifflaRth normal airport operations, <br />tuding Iing and!Woff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is <br />fo ise c atibility pr�ram implementation, it will not cause or <br />_ per wmali in I €-- use, within its jurisdiction, that will <br />ucg-1 WMcom Mift. <br />_vW respect to the airport, of the noise <br />atibTR&-Rrogramasures upon which Federal funds have <br />The r3dentialTnd commercial land uses under the proposed <br />are conent with the height standards of the AELUP. <br />i. sed buildings associated with the Project would not <br />ex -the sloping, three-dimensional 100:1 (one percent sloping <br />surface from the nearest runway over 3,200 feet in actual length) <br />FAA notification surface to require the Filing of FAA Form 7460-1. <br />This fact is stated in the ALUC staff report and was repeated at <br />the ALUC hearing on the Project. Despite this fact, the Project <br />proponent filed with the FAA and received a Determination of No <br />Hazard to Air Navigation on March 5, 2020. <br />ii. The Project does not exceed the sloping, three-dimensional 50:1 <br />FAA precision instrument Approach Surface to JWA Runway 20R. <br />This fact is stated in the ALUC staff report and was repeated at <br />Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />75C-987 Page 8 of 13 <br />