My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
08/18/2020
>
75C - PH - THE BOWERY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 5:10:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 4:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75C
Date
8/18/2020
Destruction Year
2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1021
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
f <br />the ALUC hearing on the Project. Despite this fact, the Project <br />proponent filed with the FAA and received a Determination of No <br />Hazard to Air Navigation on March 5, 2020. <br />Overflight. "Close to the JWA approach centerline" as identified by the <br />ALUC is neither an FAA nor an AELUP standard. <br />The FAA is the only authoritative source of aviation safety data <br />and the FAA does not have a "close to the JWA approach <br />centerline" standard. The FAA's Aeronautical Study of the Project <br />and Determinations of No Hazards Air Navigation issued on <br />March 5, 2020 are the only authors > source of airspace impact <br />information as stated in the AEA <br />ii. The AELUP clearly ideatifRres its wort land use planning <br />standards around aircr��oise, safetd height. Objective <br />measures of these lards are clea &ntified in AELUP <br />Section 2.1. The Prot consistent with eaf these objective <br />—a <br />standards. <br />iii. Two-dimensrfilight tracksa list of unassociated aircraft do <br />nothing to inpact overflights. The ALUC provided <br />one day of areal ij�f�� cks, oil' ay of departure flight tracks <br />and -fists of aircr y tim— iay a6lRi1ttude that were purported <br />iv. Ire Projec roponerl�pared three-dimensional models of the <br />A,proed flight tfc information to depict actual overflight <br />prot_ - <br /># —.. =-paled model of the Project. These three- <br />- _. <br />imens�I modE�o_wtat some residents and users of the <br />p __e_erty w fd likely b le to see aircraft flying past the property <br />froi rtainRiktions. Aircraft noise information from the AELUP, <br />the JC GAIP-M and from the Project EIR demonstrate that the <br />noise ifWct woad be less than 60 dBA CNEL and less than <br />single eMt noise standards identified in the JWA GAIP EIR. <br />V. Jkm—afWise contours used to objectively measure noise impact <br />alb_gr ssume flight tracks and actual operating conditions for a <br />full year including future operations. One day of arrival flight <br />tracks and one day of departure flight tracks are simple anecdotes <br />and not substantive evidence. <br />vi. The project is located outside of the JWA single event noise <br />exposure areas documented in the JWA General Aviation <br />Improvement Program EIR certified on June 25, 2019. The <br />project developer presented this information to the ALUC <br />Commission at its hearing on May 21, 2020. <br />Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />75C-988 Page 9 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.