Laserfiche WebLink
vii. ALUC Commissioners Monin and Murphy asked for but did not <br />receive evidence of general aviation aircraft using Runway 2R/20L <br />would "be turning right in front of the site." In fact, the GA aircraft <br />pattern and voluntary noise abatement procedures for Runway <br />2R/20L operate within one to two miles from the end of the runway <br />north of the airport and on a 15-degree offset from the extended <br />runway centerline to avoid airspace conflicts with aircraft arriving <br />Runway 20R. This location places GA aircraft south of Barranca <br />Parkway and aligned with the Tustin Legacy property southeast of <br />the Project site. These regular GA aircraft flight tracks are <br />substantiated in the presentation bya-YA staff on April 6, 2019 at <br />a Town Hall meeting about the GPI <br />Heliports. Heliports are not a part <br />Zone Change and Genera <br />change, and General Plan <br />AELUP aircraft noise, safe <br />consistent with the larger plat <br />approach centerline" -is not an <br />Amendrrr The proposed zone <br />ent are consent with the objective <br />height standard>Und are therefore <br />ole owe ALUC. ase to the JWA <br />ALUC offers Wntiationt overflights of new residents <br />would be distt—wed �noyedM� the contrary, the ALUC <br />demonstrates thIM& he ?!% is load outside of the 60 dBA <br />�� S be conto As ProiW would not add any new <br />tdent r coma oise I acts to the JWA 65 dBA <br />171munitoise Eqt ant Level (NEL) noise area. <br />Fligl md§ f e day rrivals and one day of departures are <br />rt urtr—€_ and ullYWaccounted for in the one year of <br />ightf-�sed to meagre CNEL noise impacts associated with <br />JVIr- - <br />Flight tics for oefire day of arrivals and one day of departures are <br />not uniq & and are fully accounted for in the single -event noise <br />tontour � produced for the JWA GAIP EIR. The Project is located <br />aq='dtMhese single -event noise contours. <br />iv. The ZWA comments on the Project conflict with its own noise <br />analysis contained in the GAIP EIR. The ALUC staff report states, <br />"Because of the project location within the primary approach <br />corridor and its proximity to JWA (2.25 miles), JWA stated it is not <br />supportive of the proposed residential portion of the project." The <br />objective analysis and conclusions of the JWA GAIP EIR find that <br />the objective aircraft noise analysis demonstrate that the Project <br />would be located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour and <br />would have no impact on operations at JWA due to height. <br />Resolution No. 2020-xx <br />75C-989 Page 10 of 13 <br />