My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Planning Commission (2002-Present)
>
2020
>
03-30-20 Special Meeting
>
5 1109 N BROADWAY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2020 9:33:47 PM
Creation date
11/9/2020 9:31:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PBA
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
O NE B RO A D WA Y P LA Z A P RO J E CT E I R A D DE N DU M CI T Y O F S A NT A A NA <br />5. Environmental Analysis <br />March 2020 Page 99 <br />Environmental Issues <br />Substantial Change in Project <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />Substantial Change in Circum-stances <br />Requiring Major EIR Revisions <br />New Information Showing New <br />or Increased Significant Effects <br />Less Than Significant <br />Impact/No Changes or New Information <br />Requiring Preparation of an EIR No Impact <br />d) Expose people or structures to significant <br />risks, including downslope or downstream <br />flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, <br />post-fire slope instability, or drainage <br />changes? <br /> x <br /> <br />The Project Site (and the City of Santa Ana) is not within or near a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone <br />according to CalFire. The Project Site is also not within or near in a State Responsibility Area (SRA). <br />Comments: <br />a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? <br />Less Than Significant Impact/No Changes or New Information Requiring Preparation of an EIR. <br />The Initial Study for the Approved Project states that there are no designated emergency evacuation rou tes in <br />the City. As with the Approved Project, operation of the Proposed Project could interfere with response times <br />of emergency vehicles but after implementation of appropriate mitigation would assure that impacts would <br />remain less than significant. Incorporation of Mitigation Measures PS-1 through PS-9 would ensure that the <br />Proposed Project would result in a less than significant impact to police protection, and fire and emergency <br />services. Specifically, Mitigation Measures PS-8 would ensure that emergency vehicles receive green lights with <br />preemption detectors at identified intersections. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially impact <br />an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, the Proposed Project would <br />not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects that <br />would require the preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br />b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose <br />project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a <br />wildfire? <br />No Impact. The Proposed Project is located in an urban environment and is surrounded by existing <br />development. There are no wildland areas, nor wildland interface areas located in the vicinity. Consequently, no <br />wildland fires would affect, or be affected by implementation of the Proposed Project. No impact would occur <br />for the Proposed Project and no changes or new information would require preparation of a subsequent EIR. <br />5 - 153
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.