My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
65D - POLICE OVERSIGHT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2020
>
12/15/2020
>
65D - POLICE OVERSIGHT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 9:07:00 AM
Creation date
12/15/2020 9:01:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
65D
Date
12/15/2020
Destruction Year
2025
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
192
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANAHEIM Response to Police Review Board <br />POLICE October zoigReport 1 <br />5 <br />California and that shortage often results in calls for service and complaints related to parking <br />violations. With the understanding that these complaint driven calls go to the police department and <br />other City departments, and must be responded to and hopefully resolved, APD agrees to work with <br />the City to evaluate and find solutions to enhance parking across the city to minimize disparate <br />impacts. <br />Recommendation 6: Records release policy (fees) <br />As the Department and City continues to adapt to new records release requirements under recent <br />state law, they should waive costs for records production under SB 1421 when requested by the <br />impacted individual or immediate family members. <br />As discussed during a public PRB meeting, City policy sets fees for services and records, and <br />establishes what records are subject to fees consistent with California law. The department does not <br />possess the authority to establish fees, and must be cognizant of unintended consequences of waiving <br />fees in certain circumstances. The department continues, however, to confer regularly with City <br />management and specifically the City Attorneys Office to ensure the current fee schedule comports <br />with state and case law. <br />It is not the intention of the department to obstruct the receipt of relevant records. On the contrary, <br />the department has assigned two (z) full-time positions as well as a contractor to fulfill the <br />requirements of SB 1421. Many of the records subject to release pursuant to SB 1421 demand <br />significant redaction and extraction to avoid releasing the identities and/or likenesses of minors, crime <br />victims or others whose images or voice are captured via body worn camera or other electronic device. <br />The personnel costs required for this redaction are absorbed by the department and have necessitated <br />the redeployment of resources. For these and other reasons, requiring reasonable payment to offset <br />some of these costs is necessary. <br />Recommendation 7: Community Engagement <br />The Department should reinforce its commitment to the new "Five Minute Engagement' program <br />and look for ways to incentivize positive officer participation in this and other community <br />engagement initiatives. <br />One ofAPD's core objectives, the engagement of the community it serves is an institutional priority. <br />PRB's recognition of the importance of this commitment is well -taken and the department concurs <br />with the recommendation to identify additional ways to incentivize and further engrain the <br />philosophy throughout the organization. <br />65D-73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.