Laserfiche WebLink
checking. Unit prices will be based on recent City projects <br />adjusted for inflation using applicable price index data. An <br />appropriate contingency will be included to reflect the level <br />of design at the time of the estimate. An updated estimate <br />will be included with each plan submittal (90% and Final). <br />At this stage, the opinion of probable cost will be a key item <br />since with the added design evolution it will be more <br />accurate and any variance from the available funding can <br />be addressed by scope adjustment (increase or decrease <br />as needed). In the Understanding of Need section above, <br />the H&A Team has identified several cost reduction <br />measures to be considered. <br />Prior to the submittal to the City for review, the documents <br />will go through the H&A QA/QC process described <br />elsewhere in this proposal. <br />TASK 3 — 90% and 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCS <br />The H&A Team will first address all City staff review <br />comments made on the 50% submittal and make the <br />necessary revisions. Next the documents will be <br />developed into a complete set of bid documents for the <br />90% submittal. H&A intends there will be few, if any, City <br />review comments on the 90% submittal. The package will <br />include all of the items listed in the RFP on page Al-3 and <br />be ready for building permit submittal with all required <br />supporting calculations and documentation. <br />Specifications <br />The specifications will include the City's boiler -plate <br />specifications and technical specifications complete and in <br />full conformance with City requirements. All technical <br />specifications will be based on Greenbook standards or <br />City provided sections. <br />Permitting <br />As with the earlier packages, prior to the submittal to the <br />City for review, the documents will go through the H&A <br />QA/QC process described elsewhere in this proposal. <br />Our goal is to have a single building permit review and then <br />approval upon resubmittal; however, we have included a <br />second cycle in our schedule to be conservative. <br />The final set of bid documents will incorporate all the City <br />review comments and building permit inputs and go <br />RFP No. 20-154 <br />Santiago Park Main Street Entrance Design <br />BreakdownWork <br />G QC Review <br />H&A Team <br />CITY REVIEW (50% <br />H <br />CITY <br />2 submittal) <br />50% City review - prepare <br />;agenda, hold meeting, <br />CITY and H&A <br />prepare minutes, revise <br />Team <br />tans <br />A ! Develop 90% design plans - <br />H&A Team <br />Civil Engineering <br />Develop 90% design plans <br />— Structural (No longer <br />needed in revised <br />B proposal since <br />H&A Team <br />cantilevered viewing <br />decks and pedestrian <br />bridge eliminated.) <br />Develop 90% design plans - <br />H&A Team <br />Landscape <br />D Develop 90% design plans - <br />H&A Team <br />Electrical <br />3 ? E Update cost estimate to <br />H&A Team <br />90% level <br />Prepare draft technical <br />F <br />specifications <br />H&A Team <br />G ! QC Review <br />H&A Team <br />CITY REVIEW (90% <br />H submittal) including <br />CITY <br />building permit process <br />90% City review - prepare <br />i agenda, hold meeting, <br />CITY and H&A <br />! prepare minutes, revise <br />Team <br />tans <br />i Develop 100% design plans <br />H&A Team <br />- Civil Engineering <br />HUNSAKER &ASSOCIATES IRVINE, INC. <br />