My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FULL AGENDA PACKET 2021-06-15
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
06/15/2021 Regular
>
FULL AGENDA PACKET 2021-06-15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2021 10:12:11 AM
Creation date
7/12/2021 8:43:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Date
6/15/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
729
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROPOSAL: <br />The lee proposal ;hall be submitted concunantly with the technical proposal, <br />but as a separate attachment, clearly labeled aN "Fee Proposal." The tec <br />proposal shall include a list otall positions, hourly rates, equipment and <br />material costs, and any other costs required to perform the services described <br />in the Scope of Work detailed in Attachment 1 of this RFP. Additionally, <br />contractors shall complete. a CONTRACT COMPARISON FORM, attached <br />as Appendix Attachment 4 to this RFP, and subunit it to the City as part of the <br />fee proposal in PlanetBids. <br />The fee proposal will not be opened until the proposals have been evaluated <br />by the proposal selection committee- The City will NeleCt the consultant based <br />oil qualifications, and then negotiate a contract price based on available <br />funding. <br />4. CERTIFICATION',; - <br />The following tones shall be signed and included as pint of the ptoposal <br />submiltat package: <br />• Attachment 3-1 : Nnn-Collusion ,Affidavit <br />• Attachment 3-2: Non -Lobbying Certification <br />• Attachment 3-3: Nun -Discrimination Certification <br />IV. PROPOSAL REVIEW (CONSULTANT SELECTION) <br />A. EVALUATION AND RATING <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals are specified in: <br />RFP ShCTTON I - TNTRODUCTTON / PROJECT DPSCRTPTTON- <br />B. SELECTION <br />The selection committee will be comprised ofat least (3) City stab. The committee may <br />interview the top ranking proposers. The City will recommend award of contracts to the <br />proposers who will provide the best value and experlise to the City. The City reserves the <br />tight to begin negotiations and Enter into a contract without intcuvicw or fut7her <br />disCussiorts- <br />V. CONTRACT AWARD <br />A. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Following evaluation and rating, by the proposal review committee, the Pn>jcci Manager <br />will recommend awarding contracts to the two top-r,3nking proposers that wil I provide <br />the bell value and expertise to the Cily. <br />City Council <br />26-15 <br />6/15/2021 <br />City of Santa Ana Rh'P 21-004 Pagc 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.