My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2021
>
01/19/2021 Regular
>
Item 27 - Appeal Application Nos. 2020-03 and 2020-04 - Central Pointe Mixed-Use Development
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2024 2:34:56 PM
Creation date
8/22/2023 9:23:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
27
Date
1/19/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
694
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4W THE CONCORD GROUT <br />IV <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: City of Santa Ana <br />From: THE CONCOIRI® GkOUIP <br />Date: October 22, 2020 <br />Re: Viability of a Grocery Store and Market Optimal Scale of Retail for the 4th and Cabrillo Project <br />in Santa Ana, CA <br />In August 2020, The Concord Group ("TCG") completed a highest and best use analysis for the 4th and Cabrillo project in <br />Santa Ana. It was TCG's conclusion that the current plan set forth by the developer, which includes 644 apartments and <br />15,200 square feet of retail, is the highest and best use for the property. <br />Per preliminary feedback from the Planning Commission, we understand the City would like further explanation with <br />regards to two key conclusions in the analysis: <br />1. A grocery store is not supportable on site; <br />2. The +/- 15,000 square feet of retail planned is the maximum marketable retail square footage that the project can <br />support. <br />Grocery Store <br />A grocery store is not viable in the project. Grocery stores require: (1) a high degree of marketing visibility; (2) high <br />density of nearby rooftops with strong incomes; and (3) and convenient accessibility. <br />1. With regards to point 1, the project possesses attractive visibility along 4th Street, with up to 30,000 cars passing by <br />the site daily. However, with regards to points 2 and 3, the project fails. <br />2. The density of rooftops and associated incomes is insufficient to attract a grocery tenant. Within a one -mile radius <br />of the project, there are only 9,800 households, with incomes well below the County median. <br />3. Only in the most urban settings (ie. downtown Los Angeles, Santa Monica), will grocery operators consider <br />structured parking for their shoppers. Grocery shoppers seek "easy in / easy out" accessibility. The large amount <br />of surface parking required for a grocery store would render the mixed -use character of the project financially <br />infeasible. <br />Scale of Retail <br />The current scale of retail planned for the project is the maximum that can be supported on the site. There are several <br />marketing concerns limiting the market viability of more retail on site: <br />1. There is limited demand for new retail in the site's trade area. Over the last ten years, only 100,000 square feet of <br />retail has been added, with no improvements to retail occupancy during the timeframe. <br />2. Secondly, successful, large-scale commercial shopping destinations require anchor tenancy — typically a grocery — <br />which is not viable on site. Anchor tenants are the "draw" that attract consumers to the smaller, in -line tenant <br />spaces. <br />3. Lastly, while mixed -use retail and residential is common in the most densely populated urban settings, a large scale <br />of ground floor retail is not viable in a suburban setting. TCG surveyed three mixed -use projects in Orange County, <br />with ground level retail footprints ranging from 8,500 to 14,000 square feet. Two of the three projects were <br />considered distressed, with elevated rates of retail vacancy (54% and 70%). Like the subject, each mixed -use analog <br />lacks an anchor tenant magnet to attract consumers. <br />In summary, TCG considers the current land plan to be the highest and best use for the 4th and Cabrillo site. <br />The above assignment was completed Michael Reynolds and David Prokopenko. Should you have any questions regarding <br />the data or conclusions generated by the analysis, feel free to contact us at (949) 717-6450. <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA October 2020 <br />4th and Cabrillo Project 20233.00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.