1925 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In Re Resolution No.1559 Approving Assessment Diagram E.Bishop, Hickory & Wakeham In Re Resolution No.1560 Approving Assessment Diagram South Van Ness. In Re Resolution Approving Assessment No.1561 N. Baker Street. In Re Resolution Ordering Work No.1882 - Hickory ~t. 108 Trustee Chapman introduced a resolution approving assessment diagram for work done andlmprovement made on Hickory St., East Bishop and Wakeham Avenue in accordance with Resolution No. 1559. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution No. 1559 and ~ ssed by the follow. inS vo~ e: Ayes: Trustees C.H.Chapman, Geo.NcPhee, E.B.Collier, F.L.Purlnton. Noes: Trustees Noue. Absent: Trustee J.~.Tubbs~ Trustee NcPhee introduced a resolution ap~oving assessment diagram for work cb ne and improvement made on South Van Ness Avenue in accordance with ?~solutiou of Intention No.1496. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution No.1860 and passed by the follOw- ing vote: Ayes: Trustees C.H.Chapman, Geo. NcPhee, E.R.Collier, F.L. Purinton. Noes: Trustees None. Absent: Trustee J.W. Tubbs. This being the day and_hour set for hearing anpeals or protests of any person iuterested in the work, improve. ment or assessment made therefor on a portion of North Baker Street, as per Resolution of Intention No. 14~0, and no person appearing to protest or object against th. assessment or any other of the proceedings taken, s resolution overruling protests or objections to assess- ment, approving assessment and ordering the Street Superintendent to attach warrant and record, was duly ~ntro~:ced, read, considered, designated Resolution Ne. 1561 and ~ ssed by the following vote: Ayes: Trustees C.~I.Uha~vaan, Geo. ~cPhee, E.B.Collier, F.L.Purinton. Noes: Trustees None. Absent: Trusteem .I.~.Tubbs. This being the time and place act forth in Resolution ~ Intention No.1547 to order work done and improvement made upon and along a p~ tion of Hickory Street, and the Board of Trustees being duly convened in open session, proceeded to hear and pass upon all protests. No owner of property liable to be assessed for said work made written protest or any protest against the propm ed work or against the extent of the district to assessed therefor and no person appearing to l~test or