1929 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

In He ReBo. No. 2121 Award--Bishop, Wakeham, etal. In Re Reso. No. ~1~ Award--Grand & Second. record, was duly introduced, read, considered, designated Resolution No~ 2120 and passed by the following vote: &yes, Trustees J.L. Mcbride, W.J. Kelly, Stanley E.' Goode, F.L. Purinton. Noes, Trustees None. Absent, Trustees Homer C. Chancy. This being the time and place fixed for the opening of bids or proposals for the work ordered done and improve- ment made upon Bishop, Wakeham, Wisteria, Beverley, Harwood, Oak, Kilson and Hickory Streets, according to plans and specifications, as briefly described in Reso- lution of Intention No. 2111, and the City Council being duly convened in open session proceeded to and did pub- licly open, examine and ~eclare all bids received as follows: Pacific Eng. & Construction Co. Walker & Martin Osborne Company W. Rae Hobson Rebertson Electric Corp. Gllbert-Weston-Stearns On motion of Trustee Goode, Item 1. Item Z. $6329.00 $ 139.00 7315.00 135~00 7200.00 140.00 6S43~00 1§,853.00 6141.00 14V.O0 6260.00 160.00 seconded by Kelly and car- tied, the bids were referred to the Engineer for checking to report back at this meeting. Following the report, the City Council awarded the contract to the Pacifl c Engineering & Construction Company as the lowest respon- sible bidder therefor. A resolution was introduced awarding the contract to the Pacific ~gineering & Construction Company. The resolution was ordered filed, read, considered, designated Resolution No. 2121 and passed by the following vote: Ayes, Trustees J.L. Mcbride, W.J. Kelly, Stanley E. Goode, F.L. Purinton. Noes, Trustees None. Absent, Trustees Homer C. Chancy. This being the time and place fixed for the opening of bids or proposals for the work ordered done and improve- ment m~de upon Grand Avenue and Second Street, according to plans and specifications, as briefly described in Resolution of Intention No. 2109, ami the City Council being duly convened in open session proceeded to and did publicly open, examine and declare all bids received as follows: Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Osborne Company .17~ .16~ .20~ .50~ Griffith Company .12L~/SO .15 .20 .48 Steele Finley .15 .16 .22 .50 Item 5 Total .75 $11,279.60 · 65 8,791.35 .75 10,151.72 On motion of T~ustee Goode, tied, seconded by Mcbride and car~ the bids were referred tO the City Engineer for